Literature DB >> 19153841

SCRAM: A scoring and ranking system for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances for the North American Great Lakes. Part I: Structure of the scoring and ranking system.

E M Snyder1, S A Snyder, J P Giesy, S A Blonde, G K Hurlburt, C L Summer, R R Mitchell, D M Bush.   

Abstract

Hundreds of chemical contaminants have been identified in the Great Lakes System of North America. Depending on the agency or organization, various subset lists of these contaminants have been identified as chemicals of potential concern. However, there is no agreement on the method that should be used to make management decisions. Except for consensus on approximately 40 chemicals that most North American agencies agree can cause deleterious effects if released into the environment, no agreement has been reached regarding the priority that contaminants should receive for further action. That leaves hundreds of chemicals that have been, are being, or potentially could be released into the environment that have not been evaluated yet. A profile for potential chemicals of concern is generally thought to include persistence in the environment, potential to bioaccumulate, and ability to cause toxic effects at environmentally relevant concentrations. Except for the International Joint Commission's definition of persistence (> 8 weeks residence time in air, water, soil or sediment), there is little concurrence about what defines these characteristics. For instance, the State of Michigan currently has no established definitions or profiles of persistent, bioaccumulative, toxic substances. Furthermore, there is no standard process to rank chemicals relative to these characteristics. The Chemical Scoring and Ranking Assessment Model (SCRAM) has been developed to provide a process to rank-order chemicals based on these characteristics. The SCRAM system was developed primarily for use in the Great Lakes region of North America and particularly in Michigan, but it is not site-specific. Use of this system may assist in pollution prevention activities and other future chemical control efforts, allowing attention to be focused first on those chemicals likely to present the greatest hazard.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 19153841     DOI: 10.1007/BF03028072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  10 in total

1.  SCRAM: A scoring and ranking system for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances for the North American Great Lakes. Part III: Acute and subchronic or chronic toxicity.

Authors:  E M Snyder; S A Snyder; J P Giesy; S A Blonde; G K Hurlburt; C L Summer; R R Mitchell; D M Bush
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  SCRAM: A scoring and ranking system for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances for the North American Great Lakes. Part II: Bioaccumulation potential and persistence.

Authors:  E M Snyder; S A Snyder; J P Giesy; S A Blonde; G K Hurlburt; C L Summer; R R Mitchell; D M Bush
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  SCRAM: A scoring and ranking system for persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic substances for the North American Great Lakes. Part IV: Results from representative chemicals, sensitivity analysis, and discriminatory power.

Authors:  E M Snyder; S A Snyder; J P Giesy; S A Blonde; G K Hurlburt; C L Summer; R R Mitchell; D M Bush
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Environmental hazard - Assessment of chemicals and products : Part III: The limits to single compound assessment.

Authors:  W Klöpffer
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Environmental hazard : Assessment of chemicals and products.

Authors:  W Klöpffer
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Environmental hazard : Assessment of chemicals and products Part I: General assessment principles.

Authors:  W Klöpffer
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Part IV: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA).

Authors:  W Klöpffer
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.223

8.  Outline on risk assessment programme of existing substances in the European Union.

Authors:  R F Hertel
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 4.860

9.  Assessments of priority substances under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act Variations in exposure and response.

Authors:  B Meek
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 4.860

Review 10.  U.S. EPA regulatory perspectives on the use of QSAR for new and existing chemical evaluations.

Authors:  M Zeeman; C M Auer; R G Clements; J V Nabholz; R S Boethling
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.000

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Construction of a chemical ranking system of soil pollution substances for screening of priority soil contaminants in Korea.

Authors:  Seung-Woo Jeong; Youn-Joo An
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  The spatial scale of organic chemicals in multimedia fate modeling. Recent developments and significance for chemical assessment.

Authors:  M Scheringer; K Hungerbühler; M Matthies
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Health risk assessment of exposure to organic matter from the use of reclaimed water in toilets.

Authors:  Zhi-Guang Niu; Xue Zang; Jian-Guo Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 4.223

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.