Literature DB >> 19153710

EST, COSII, and arbitrary gene markers give similar estimates of nucleotide diversity in cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.).

Joanne A Labate1, Larry D Robertson, Feinan Wu, Steven D Tanksley, Angela M Baldo.   

Abstract

Because cultivated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is low in genetic diversity, public, verified single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers within the species are in demand. To promote marker development we resequenced approximately 23 kb in a diverse set of 31 tomato lines including TA496. Three classes of markers were sampled: (1) 26 expressed-sequence tag (EST), all of which were predicted to be polymorphic based on TA496, (2) 14 conserved ortholog set II (COSII) or unigene, and (3) ten published sequences, composed of nine fruit quality genes and one anonymous RFLP marker. The latter two types contained mostly noncoding DNA. In total, 154 SNPs and 34 indels were observed. The distributions of nucleotide diversity estimates among marker types were not significantly different from each other. Ascertainment bias of SNPs was evaluated for the EST markers. Despite the fact that the EST markers were developed using SNP prediction within a sample consisting of only one TA496 allele and one additional allele, the majority of polymorphisms in the 26 EST markers were represented among the other 30 tomato lines. Fifteen EST markers with published SNPs were more closely examined for bias. Mean SNP diversity observations were not significantly different between the original discovery sample of two lines (53 SNPs) and the 31 line diversity panel (56 SNPs). Furthermore, TA496 shared its haplotype with at least one other line at 11 of the 15 markers. These data demonstrate that public EST databases and noncoding regions are a valuable source of unbiased SNP markers in tomato.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19153710     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-008-0957-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  39 in total

1.  Gene structure prediction by spliced alignment of genomic DNA with protein sequences: increased accuracy by differential splice site scoring.

Authors:  J Usuka; V Brendel
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-04-14       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  A comparison of bayesian methods for haplotype reconstruction from population genotype data.

Authors:  Matthew Stephens; Peter Donnelly
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-10-20       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  PIP: a database of potential intron polymorphism markers.

Authors:  Long Yang; Gulei Jin; Xiangqian Zhao; Yan Zheng; Zhaohua Xu; Weiren Wu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-06-01       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  An alternative pathway to beta -carotene formation in plant chromoplasts discovered by map-based cloning of beta and old-gold color mutations in tomato.

Authors:  G Ronen; L Carmel-Goren; D Zamir; J Hirschberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities.

Authors:  B Ewing; P Green
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Sequence of the phytoene desaturase locus of tomato.

Authors:  B Aracri; G E Bartley; P A Scolnik; G Giuliano
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 8.340

7.  Comparative sequencing in the genus Lycopersicon. Implications for the evolution of fruit size in the domestication of cultivated tomatoes.

Authors:  T Clint Nesbitt; Steven D Tanksley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Advanced backcross QTL analysis in a cross between an elite processing line of tomato and its wild relative L. pimpinellifolium.

Authors:  S D Tanksley; S Grandillo; T M Fulton; D Zamir; Y Eshed; V Petiard; J Lopez; T Beck-Bunn
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.699

9.  A comparison of simple sequence repeat and single nucleotide polymorphism marker technologies for the genotypic analysis of maize (Zea mays L.).

Authors:  E S Jones; H Sullivan; D Bhattramakki; J S C Smith
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.574

10.  Diversity in conserved genes in tomato.

Authors:  Allen Van Deynze; Kevin Stoffel; C Robin Buell; Alexander Kozik; Jia Liu; Esther van der Knaap; David Francis
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  9 in total

1.  Genomics of fungal disease resistance in tomato.

Authors:  Dilip R Panthee; Feng Chen
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.236

2.  SNP discovery and linkage map construction in cultivated tomato.

Authors:  Kenta Shirasawa; Sachiko Isobe; Hideki Hirakawa; Erika Asamizu; Hiroyuki Fukuoka; Daniel Just; Christophe Rothan; Shigemi Sasamoto; Tsunakazu Fujishiro; Yoshie Kishida; Mitsuyo Kohara; Hisano Tsuruoka; Tsuyuko Wada; Yasukazu Nakamura; Shusei Sato; Satoshi Tabata
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 4.458

3.  Genetic diversity and population structure in Physalis peruviana and related taxa based on InDels and SNPs derived from COSII and IRG markers.

Authors:  Gina A Garzón-Martínez; Jaime A Osorio-Guarín; Paola Delgadillo-Durán; Franklin Mayorga; Felix E Enciso-Rodríguez; David Landsman; Leonardo Mariño-Ramírez; Luz Stella Barrero
Journal:  Plant Gene       Date:  2015-12-01

4.  High-density SNP genotyping of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) reveals patterns of genetic variation due to breeding.

Authors:  Sung-Chur Sim; Allen Van Deynze; Kevin Stoffel; David S Douches; Daniel Zarka; Martin W Ganal; Roger T Chetelat; Samuel F Hutton; John W Scott; Randolph G Gardner; Dilip R Panthee; Martha Mutschler; James R Myers; David M Francis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Evidence of cryptic introgression in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) based on wild tomato species alleles.

Authors:  Joanne A Labate; Larry D Robertson
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 4.215

6.  Genetic variation in the Solanaceae fruit bearing species lulo and tree tomato revealed by Conserved Ortholog (COSII) markers.

Authors:  Felix Enciso-Rodríguez; Rodrigo Martínez; Mario Lobo; Luz Stella Barrero
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 1.771

7.  Mapping and linkage disequilibrium analysis with a genome-wide collection of SNPs that detect polymorphism in cultivated tomato.

Authors:  Matthew D Robbins; Sung-Chur Sim; Wencai Yang; Allen Van Deynze; Esther van der Knaap; Tarek Joobeur; David M Francis
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 6.992

8.  Genome-wide association mapping in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is possible using genome admixture of Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme.

Authors:  Nicolas Ranc; Stephane Muños; Jiaxin Xu; Marie-Christine Le Paslier; Aurélie Chauveau; Rémi Bounon; Sophie Rolland; Jean-Paul Bouchet; Dominique Brunel; Mathilde Causse
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Whole genome resequencing in tomato reveals variation associated with introgression and breeding events.

Authors:  Mathilde Causse; Nelly Desplat; Laura Pascual; Marie-Christine Le Paslier; Christopher Sauvage; Guillaume Bauchet; Aurélie Bérard; Rémi Bounon; Maria Tchoumakov; Dominique Brunel; Jean-Paul Bouchet
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.969

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.