Literature DB >> 19152540

The role of spatial attention in nonconscious processing: a comparison of face and nonface stimuli.

Matthew Finkbeiner1, Romina Palermo.   

Abstract

Recent findings from the masked priming paradigm have revealed a surprising influence of higher-level cognitive systems (i.e., attention) on nonconscious cognitive processes. These data have effectively undermined the long-standing assumption in cognitive science that nonconscious processes are carried out independently of attention and have quickly led to the opposite view that attention is a prerequisite for nonconscious processes. Here we present evidence for a middle position by showing that the dependence of nonconscious processes on attention varies with the type of information to be processed. Specifically, we found that nonconsciously perceived faces engaged cognitive processes regardless of attention, whereas nonface stimuli engaged cognitive processes only when attended. These qualitatively different patterns suggest two distinct processing routes: one that is modulated by visual attention and one that is not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19152540     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02256.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  25 in total

1.  Conditional automaticity in subliminal morphosyntactic priming.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Bert Reynvoet; Jessica Hendler; Lennart Oettl; Stefan Evert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-06-12

2.  Race and gender of faces can be ignored.

Authors:  Janice E Murray; Liana Machado; Benjamin Knight
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-10-15

3.  Feature-specific attention allocation overrules the orienting response to emotional stimuli.

Authors:  Tom Everaert; Adriaan Spruyt; Valentina Rossi; Gilles Pourtois; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Visual search efficiency is greater for human faces compared to animal faces.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Simpson; Haley L Husband; Krysten Yee; Alison Fullerton; Krisztina V Jakobsen
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2014

5.  Monocular advantage for face perception implicates subcortical mechanisms in adult humans.

Authors:  Shai Gabay; Adrian Nestor; Eva Dundas; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Preserved sensory processing but hampered conflict detection when stimulus input is task-irrelevant.

Authors:  Tristan Bekinschtein; Simon van Gaal; Stijn Adriaan Nuiten; Andrés Canales-Johnson; Lola Beerendonk; Nutsa Nanuashvili; Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Ignored faces produce figural face aftereffects.

Authors:  Janice E Murray; Madeline Judge; Yan Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The flexibility of nonconsciously deployed cognitive processes: evidence from masked congruence priming.

Authors:  Matthew Finkbeiner; Jason Friedman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Famous faces demand attention due to reduced inhibitory processing.

Authors:  Liana Machado; Hayley Guiney; Andrew Mitchell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Spatial and temporal attention modulate the early stages of face processing: behavioural evidence from a reaching paradigm.

Authors:  Genevieve L Quek; Matthew Finkbeiner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.