Literature DB >> 19152382

Molecular cytogenetic evaluation of the mechanism of micronuclei formation induced by camptothecin, topotecan, and irinotecan.

Sabry M Attia1, Abdulaziz M Aleisa, Saleh A Bakheet, Abdulaziz A Al-Yahya, Salim S Al-Rejaie, Abdelkader E Ashour, Othman A Al-Shabanah.   

Abstract

We used the conventional bone marrow micronucleus test complemented with the fluorescent in situ hybridization with the minor satellite DNA probe to investigate the mechanisms of induction of micronuclei in mice treated with camptothecin and its clinical antineoplastic analogues topotecan and irinotecan. All experiments were performed with male Swiss albino mice. Single doses of 1 mg/kg camptothecin or 0.6 mg/kg topotecan were injected intraperitoneally and bone marrow was sampled at 30 hr (camptothecin) or 24 hr (topotecan) after treatment. A dose of 60 mg/kg irinotecan was injected intravenously, once every fourth day for 13 days and bone marrow was sampled 24 hr after the last treatment. In animals treated with camptothecin, a total of 1.07% micronuclei were found and 70% of them were centromere-negative, indicating their formation by DNA strand breaks and reflecting the predominant clastogenic activity of camptothecin. Exposure to topotecan and irinotecan yielded 1.71 and 0.83% micronuclei, respectively. About 52.7 and 48.8% of the induced micronuclei, respectively, were centromere-positive, indicating their formation by whole chromosomes and reflecting the aneugenic activity of both compounds. Correspondingly, about 47.3 and 51.2% of the induced micronuclei, respectively were centromere-negative, demonstrating that topotecan and irinotecan not only induce chromosome loss but also DNA strand breaks. Both the clastogenic and aneugenic potential of these drugs can lead to the development of secondary tumors and abnormal reproductive outcomes. Therefore, the clinical use of these agents must be weighed against the risks of secondary malignancies in cured patients and persistent genetic damage of their potential offspring. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19152382     DOI: 10.1002/em.20460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  7 in total

1.  Interlaboratory evaluation of a multiplexed high information content in vitro genotoxicity assay.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Derek T Bernacki; Jeffrey C Bemis; Richard A Spellman; Maria E Engel; Maik Schuler; Elisabeth Lorge; Pekka T Heikkinen; Ulrike Hemmann; Véronique Thybaud; Sabrina Wilde; Nina Queisser; Andreas Sutter; Andreas Zeller; Melanie Guérard; David Kirkland; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.216

2.  Predictions of genotoxic potential, mode of action, molecular targets, and potency via a tiered multiflow® assay data analysis strategy.

Authors:  Stephen D Dertinger; Andrew R Kraynak; Ryan P Wheeldon; Derek T Bernacki; Steven M Bryce; Nikki Hall; Jeffrey C Bemis; Sheila M Galloway; Patricia A Escobar; George E Johnson
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization in combination with the comet assay and micronucleus test in genetic toxicology.

Authors:  Galina G Hovhannisyan
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Genotoxic mode of action predictions from a multiplexed flow cytometric assay and a machine learning approach.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Derek T Bernacki; Jeffrey C Bemis; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 3.216

5.  Assessment of anti-cytogenotoxic effects of quercetin in animals treated with topotecan.

Authors:  Saleh A Bakheet
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 6.543

6.  Kinetics of γH2AX and phospho-histone H3 following pulse treatment of TK6 cells provides insights into clastogenic activity.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Stephen D Dertinger; Jeffrey C Bemis
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.954

7.  Survival analysis in second-line and third-line chemotherapy with irinotecan followed by topotecan or topotecan followed by irinotecan for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Gokmen Aktas; Tulay Kus; Mehmet Emin Kalender; Alper Sevinc; Celaletdin Camci; Seval Kul
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 4.147

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.