Literature DB >> 19152130

The RegEx trial: a randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled pilot study combining regadenoson, a selective A(2A) adenosine agonist, with low-level exercise, in patients undergoing myocardial perfusion imaging.

Gregory S Thomas1, Randall C Thompson, Michael I Miyamoto, Tze K Ip, Deborah L Rice, Douglas Milikien, Hsiao D Lieu, Vandana S Mathur.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is increasingly performed with exercise, adenosine A(2A) receptor agonists have not been studied with exercise.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety of administering regadenoson during exercise and, secondarily, to evaluate image quality, patient acceptance, and detection of perfusion defects.
METHODS: Patients requiring pharmacologic MPI received a standard adenosine-supine protocol (AdenoSup, n = 60) and were then randomized (2:1) in a double-blind manner to low-level exercise with bolus intravenous injection of regadenoson (RegEx, n = 39) or placebo (PlcEx, n = 21).
RESULTS: Adverse events occurred in 95%, 77%, and 33% of patients receiving AdenoSup, RegEx, and PlcEx, respectively. Peak heart rate was 13 beats per minute (bpm) and 21 bpm greater following RegEx compared to that following PlcEx and AdenoSup, respectively (P = .006 and <.001). Change from baseline in mean systolic blood pressure (SBP), change from baseline to nadir SBP, and percentage of patients with a decline in SBP by > or = 20 mm Hg showed no important differences between RegEx and PlcEx. No occurrences of 2nd degree or higher AV block were observed following RegEx or PlcEx; one patient developed 2nd degree AV block following AdenoSup. The mean heart-to-liver and heart-to-gut ratios were improved on RegEx vs AdenoSup: 0.85 (0.34) vs 0.65 (0.26), P < .001 and 1.1 (0.36) vs 0.97 (0.34), P < .001, respectively. Compared to AdenoSup, 70% of patients felt RegEx was much or somewhat better.
CONCLUSIONS: Combining regadenoson with low-level exercise is feasible, well tolerated, and associated with fewer side effects compared to AdenoSup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19152130     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-008-9001-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  13 in total

1.  Updated imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures, part 1.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Novel short-acting A2A adenosine receptor agonists for coronary vasodilation: inverse relationship between affinity and duration of action of A2A agonists.

Authors:  Z Gao; Z Li; S P Baker; R D Lasley; S Meyer; E Elzein; V Palle; J A Zablocki; B Blackburn; L Belardinelli
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 4.  Adenosine and adenosine receptors in the cardiovascular system: biochemistry, physiology, and pharmacology.

Authors:  J C Shryock; L Belardinelli
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1997-06-19       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging--executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging).

Authors:  Francis J Klocke; Michael G Baird; Beverly H Lorell; Timothy M Bateman; Joseph V Messer; Daniel S Berman; Patrick T O'Gara; Blase A Carabello; Richard O Russell; Manuel D Cerqueira; Martin G St John Sutton; Anthony N DeMaria; James E Udelson; J Ward Kennedy; Mario S Verani; Kim Allan Williams; Elliott M Antman; Sidney C Smith; Joseph S Alpert; Gabriel Gregoratos; Jeffrey L Anderson; Loren F Hiratzka; David P Faxon; Sharon Ann Hunt; Valentin Fuster; Alice K Jacobs; Raymond J Gibbons; Richard O Russell
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 6.  Should simultaneous exercise become the standard for adenosine myocardial perfusion imaging?

Authors:  Gregory S Thomas; Michael I Miyamoto
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Impact of selective adenosine A2A receptor agonists on cardiac imaging feeling the lightning, waiting on the thunder.

Authors:  D Douglas Miller
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial.

Authors:  Ami E Iskandrian; Timothy M Bateman; Luiz Belardinelli; Brent Blackburn; Manuel D Cerqueira; Robert C Hendel; Hsiao Lieu; John J Mahmarian; Ann Olmsted; S Richard Underwood; João Vitola; Whedy Wang
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Adenosine-mediated bronchoconstriction and lung inflammation in an allergic mouse model.

Authors:  Ming Fan; S Jamal Mustafa
Journal:  Pulm Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.410

10.  Adenosine A2b receptors evoke interleukin-8 secretion in human mast cells. An enprofylline-sensitive mechanism with implications for asthma.

Authors:  I Feoktistov; I Biaggioni
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  47 in total

Review 1.  Selective adenosine agonists and myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Gilbert J Zoghbi; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Patient-centered imaging.

Authors:  E Gordon Depuey; John J Mahmarian; Todd D Miller; Andrew J Einstein; Christopher L Hansen; Thomas A Holly; Edward J Miller; Donna M Polk; L Samuel Wann
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  A useful and easy to develop combined stress test for myocardial perfusion imaging: Regadenoson and isometric exercise, preliminary results.

Authors:  Lucile Janvier; J Pinaquy; H Douard; G Karcher; L Bordenave
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  A helping hand for regadenoson tests.

Authors:  Preeti Kansal; Thomas A Holly
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  When to re-dose regadenoson?

Authors:  Gregory S Thomas; Aaron F Jolly; Michael Safani
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  Development of asystole requiring cardiac resuscitation after the administration of regadenoson in a patient with pulmonary fibrosis receiving n-acetylcysteine.

Authors:  Erin C Grady; John T Barron; Robert H Wagner
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  The emerging role of the selective A2A agonist in pharmacologic stress testing.

Authors:  Anthony S Gemignani; Brian G Abbott
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 8.  Serious and potentially life threatening complications of cardiac stress testing: Physiological mechanisms and management strategies.

Authors:  Vasken Dilsizian; Henry Gewirtz; Nicholas Paivanas; Anastasia N Kitsiou; Fadi G Hage; Nathan E Crone; Ronald G Schwartz
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Vasodilator stress with adenosine and the gender preponderance for tolerability and manifestation of adverse symptoms: Is there a physiological basis?

Authors:  Sandip Basu
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 10.  Regadenoson: a focused update.

Authors:  Gopal Ghimire; Fadi G Hage; Jaekyeong Heo; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.