OBJECTIVE: Patient-physician language discordance is associated with worse quality of healthcare for patients with limited English proficiency. Patients with language-discordant physicians have more problems understanding medical situations. The impact of patient-physician language concordance on lifestyle counseling among Spanish-speaking patients is not known. METHODS: We performed a retrospective medical record review and identified 306 Spanish-speaking patients who used interpreter services between June 2001 and June 2006 in two Boston-based primary care practices. Our primary outcome was counseling on exercise, diet, and smoking. Our main predictor of interest was patient-physician language concordance. RESULTS: Patients with language-concordant physicians were more likely to be counseled on diet and physical activity compared to patients with language-discordant physicians. After adjustment for age, sex, insurance status, number of primary care visits, and comorbidity score, these differences in counseling persisted for diet [odds ratio (OR) = 2.2, CI 1.3-3.7] and physical activity (OR = 2.3, CI 1.4-3.8). There was no significant difference with regard to discussion of smoking (OR = 1.3, CI 0.8-2.1). CONCLUSIONS: Spanish-speaking patients are more likely to discuss diet and exercise modification if they have a Spanish-speaking physician compared to those having a non-Spanish-speaking physician. Further research is needed to explore whether matching Spanish-speaking patients with Spanish-speaking providers may improve lifestyle counseling.
OBJECTIVE:Patient-physician language discordance is associated with worse quality of healthcare for patients with limited English proficiency. Patients with language-discordant physicians have more problems understanding medical situations. The impact of patient-physician language concordance on lifestyle counseling among Spanish-speaking patients is not known. METHODS: We performed a retrospective medical record review and identified 306 Spanish-speaking patients who used interpreter services between June 2001 and June 2006 in two Boston-based primary care practices. Our primary outcome was counseling on exercise, diet, and smoking. Our main predictor of interest was patient-physician language concordance. RESULTS:Patients with language-concordant physicians were more likely to be counseled on diet and physical activity compared to patients with language-discordant physicians. After adjustment for age, sex, insurance status, number of primary care visits, and comorbidity score, these differences in counseling persisted for diet [odds ratio (OR) = 2.2, CI 1.3-3.7] and physical activity (OR = 2.3, CI 1.4-3.8). There was no significant difference with regard to discussion of smoking (OR = 1.3, CI 0.8-2.1). CONCLUSIONS: Spanish-speaking patients are more likely to discuss diet and exercise modification if they have a Spanish-speaking physician compared to those having a non-Spanish-speaking physician. Further research is needed to explore whether matching Spanish-speaking patients with Spanish-speaking providers may improve lifestyle counseling.
Authors: Laurie M Anderson; Susan C Scrimshaw; Mindy T Fullilove; Jonathan E Fielding; Jacques Normand Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Marcia G Ory; Paula J Yuma; Margo-Lea Hurwicz; Crystal Jarvis; Kate L Barron; Tom Tai-Seale; Ming Tai-Seale; Dhaval Patel; David Hackethorn; Rachel Bramson; Richard Street; Mary Ann Cook Journal: Prev Med Date: 2006-08-09 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Karen Y Gregory-Mercado; Lisa K Staten; James Ranger-Moore; Cynthia A Thomson; Julie C Will; Earl S Ford; Jose Guillen; Linda K Larkey; Anna R Giuliano; James Marshall Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2006 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Maureen A Murtaugh; Jennifer S Herrick; Carol Sweeney; Kathy B Baumgartner; Anna R Guiliano; Tim Byers; Martha L Slattery Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2007-08
Authors: Marielena Lara; Cristina Gamboa; M Iya Kahramanian; Leo S Morales; David E Hayes Bautista Journal: Annu Rev Public Health Date: 2005 Impact factor: 21.870
Authors: Melissa M Parker; Alicia Fernández; Howard H Moffet; Richard W Grant; Antonia Torreblanca; Andrew J Karter Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Lisa Diamond; Sukyung Chung; Warren Ferguson; Javier Gonzalez; Elizabeth A Jacobs; Francesca Gany Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 2.983