Literature DB >> 19151381

Genomic profiling and identification of high-risk uveal melanoma by array CGH analysis of primary tumors and liver metastases.

Julien Trolet1, Philippe Hupé, Isabelle Huon, Ingrid Lebigot, Charles Decraene, Olivier Delattre, Xavier Sastre-Garau, Simon Saule, Jean-Paul Thiéry, Corine Plancher, Bernard Asselain, Laurence Desjardins, Pascale Mariani, Sophie Piperno-Neumann, Emmanuel Barillot, Jérôme Couturier.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Incurable metastases develop in approximately 50% of patients with uveal melanoma (UM). The purpose of this study was to analyze genomic profiles in a large series of ocular tumors and liver metastases and design a genome-based classifier for metastatic risk assessment.
METHODS: A series of 86 UM tumors and 66 liver metastases were analyzed by using a BAC CGH (comparative genomic hybridization) microarray. A clustering was performed, and correlation with the metastatic status was sought among a subset of 71 patients with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The status of chromosome 3 was further examined in the tumors, and metastases with disomy 3 were checked with an SNP microarray. A prognostic classifier was constructed using a log-linear model on minimal regions and leave-one-out cross-validation.
RESULTS: The clustering divides the groups of tumors with disomy 3 and monosomy 3 into two and three subgroups, respectively. Same subgroups are found in primary tumors and in metastases, but with different frequencies. Isolated monosomy 3 was present in 0% of metastatic ocular tumors and in 3% of metastases. The highest metastatic rate in ocular tumors was observed in a subgroup defined by the gain of 8q with a proximal breakpoint, and losses of 3, 8p, and 16q, also most represented in metastases. A prognostic classifier that included the status of these markers led to an 85.9% classification accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of the status of these specific chromosome regions by genome profiling on SNP microarrays should be a reliable tool for identifying high-risk patients in future adjuvant therapy protocols.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19151381     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-2296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  42 in total

1.  Integrative Copy Number Analysis of Uveal Melanoma Reveals Novel Candidate Genes Involved in Tumorigenesis Including a Tumor Suppressor Role for PHF10/BAF45a.

Authors:  Hima Anbunathan; Ruth Verstraten; Arun D Singh; J William Harbour; Anne M Bowcock
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Frequency, molecular pathology and potential clinical significance of partial chromosome 3 aberrations in uveal melanoma.

Authors:  Mohamed H Abdel-Rahman; Benjamin N Christopher; Mohammed F Faramawi; Khaled Said-Ahmed; Carol Cole; Andrew McFaddin; Abhik Ray-Chaudhury; Nyla Heerema; Frederick H Davidorf
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Comprehensive Genetic Landscape of Uveal Melanoma by Whole-Genome Sequencing.

Authors:  Beryl Royer-Bertrand; Matteo Torsello; Donata Rimoldi; Ikram El Zaoui; Katarina Cisarova; Rosanna Pescini-Gobert; Franck Raynaud; Leonidas Zografos; Ann Schalenbourg; Daniel Speiser; Michael Nicolas; Laureen Vallat; Robert Klein; Serge Leyvraz; Giovanni Ciriello; Nicolò Riggi; Alexandre P Moulin; Carlo Rivolta
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Metastatic ocular melanoma to the liver exhibits infiltrative and nodular growth patterns.

Authors:  Hans E Grossniklaus; Qing Zhang; Shuo You; Conni McCarthy; Steffen Heegaard; Sarah E Coupland
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 5.  Superficial spreading and nodular melanoma are distinct biological entities: a challenge to the linear progression model.

Authors:  Holly S Greenwald; Erica B Friedman; Iman Osman
Journal:  Melanoma Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 6.  Molecular pathology of uveal melanoma.

Authors:  S E Coupland; S L Lake; M Zeschnigk; B E Damato
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Classification of arrayCGH data using fused SVM.

Authors:  Franck Rapaport; Emmanuel Barillot; Jean-Philippe Vert
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Determining frequent patterns of copy number alterations in cancer.

Authors:  Franck Rapaport; Christina Leslie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Establishment of novel cell lines recapitulating the genetic landscape of uveal melanoma and preclinical validation of mTOR as a therapeutic target.

Authors:  Nabil Amirouchene-Angelozzi; Fariba Nemati; David Gentien; André Nicolas; Amaury Dumont; Guillaume Carita; Jacques Camonis; Laurence Desjardins; Nathalie Cassoux; Sophie Piperno-Neumann; Pascale Mariani; Xavier Sastre; Didier Decaudin; Sergio Roman-Roman
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 6.603

10.  Patient-derived xenografts recapitulate molecular features of human uveal melanomas.

Authors:  Cécile Laurent; David Gentien; Sophie Piperno-Neumann; Fariba Némati; André Nicolas; Bruno Tesson; Laurence Desjardins; Pascale Mariani; Audrey Rapinat; Xavier Sastre-Garau; Jérôme Couturier; Philippe Hupé; Leanne de Koning; Thierry Dubois; Sergio Roman-Roman; Marc-Henri Stern; Emmanuel Barillot; J William Harbour; Simon Saule; Didier Decaudin
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 6.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.