OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of adverse respiratory outcomes among children has been frequently associated with measurements of traffic-related exposures, and other data suggest asthma severity is worsened with residence near heavy traffic. We examined the association between neighbourhood traffic burden and repeated acute respiratory illnesses that required emergency department visits and/or hospitalisation for children with a primary or secondary diagnosis of asthma (89% acute bronchitis or pneumonia). METHODS: This is a hospital-based longitudinal study of a southern California urban catchment area around two adjacent children's hospitals. Subjects' home addresses were geocoded and linked to nearby traffic data. Recurrent event proportional hazard analysis was used to estimate the hazard of repeated hospital encounters. RESULTS: We found living within 300 metres of arterial roads or freeways increased risk of repeated hospital encounters in 3297 children age 18 years or less. At highest risk were children in the top quintile of traffic density (HR = 1.21; 95% CL 0.99 to 1.49) and those who had 750 metres or more of arterial road and freeway length within 300 metres of their residence (HR = 1.18; 95% CL 0.99 to 1.41). Associations between repeated hospital encounters and residence near heavy traffic were stronger in females than males and in children without insurance or who required government sponsored insurance than children with private insurance. The gender disparity was most notable among infants (age 0) and children ages 6-18 years. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest exposure to traffic-related air pollution increases asthma severity as indicated by hospital utilisation. The finding in infants suggests this is an especially vulnerable population, although the validity of asthma diagnosis at this age is unknown. Females and children who do not have private insurance may also be more vulnerable to air pollution from traffic.
OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of adverse respiratory outcomes among children has been frequently associated with measurements of traffic-related exposures, and other data suggest asthma severity is worsened with residence near heavy traffic. We examined the association between neighbourhood traffic burden and repeated acute respiratory illnesses that required emergency department visits and/or hospitalisation for children with a primary or secondary diagnosis of asthma (89% acute bronchitis or pneumonia). METHODS: This is a hospital-based longitudinal study of a southern California urban catchment area around two adjacent children's hospitals. Subjects' home addresses were geocoded and linked to nearby traffic data. Recurrent event proportional hazard analysis was used to estimate the hazard of repeated hospital encounters. RESULTS: We found living within 300 metres of arterial roads or freeways increased risk of repeated hospital encounters in 3297 children age 18 years or less. At highest risk were children in the top quintile of traffic density (HR = 1.21; 95% CL 0.99 to 1.49) and those who had 750 metres or more of arterial road and freeway length within 300 metres of their residence (HR = 1.18; 95% CL 0.99 to 1.41). Associations between repeated hospital encounters and residence near heavy traffic were stronger in females than males and in children without insurance or who required government sponsored insurance than children with private insurance. The gender disparity was most notable among infants (age 0) and children ages 6-18 years. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest exposure to traffic-related air pollution increases asthma severity as indicated by hospital utilisation. The finding in infants suggests this is an especially vulnerable population, although the validity of asthma diagnosis at this age is unknown. Females and children who do not have private insurance may also be more vulnerable to air pollution from traffic.
Authors: Nicholas C Newman; Patrick H Ryan; Bin Huang; Andrew F Beck; Hadley S Sauers; Robert S Kahn Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2014-03-27 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Molini M Patel; James W Quinn; Kyung Hwa Jung; Lori Hoepner; Diurka Diaz; Matthew Perzanowski; Andrew Rundle; Patrick L Kinney; Frederica P Perera; Rachel L Miller Journal: Environ Res Date: 2011-08-19 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Sara E Grineski; Joan G Staniswalis; Priyangi Bulathsinhala; Yanlei Peng; Thomas E Gill Journal: Environ Res Date: 2011-07-23 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Bert Brunekreef; Alistair W Stewart; H Ross Anderson; Christopher K W Lai; David P Strachan; Neil Pearce Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2009-07-20 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Molini M Patel; Steven N Chillrud; Juan C Correa; Yair Hazi; Marian Feinberg; Deepti Kc; Swati Prakash; James M Ross; Diane Levy; Patrick L Kinney Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Kristina Bröms; Dan Norbäck; Margaretha Eriksson; Claes Sundelin; Kurt Svärdsudd Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2009-08-20 Impact factor: 3.295