Literature DB >> 19150551

Intravesical mycobacterial cell wall-DNA complex in the treatment of carcinoma in situ of the bladder after standard intravesical therapy has failed.

Alvaro Morales1, Kiran Phadke, Gary Steinhoff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of mycobacterial cell wall-DNA complex after intravesical administration in patients with carcinoma in situ in whom prior therapy with bacillus Calmette-Guerin failed or in those who were treatment naïve.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients received 6 weekly instillations of 4 or 8 mg mycobacterial cell wall-DNA complex (formulated as an emulsion) followed by 3 weekly instillations at weeks 12 and 24. Efficacy and safety were evaluated throughout the treatment phase and at months 12 and 18.
RESULTS: A total of 55 patients (mean age 74 years, 74.6% male) received 4 mg (25) or 8 mg (30) mycobacterial cell wall-DNA complex emulsion. All patients were previously treated with bacillus Calmette-Guerin except for 8 who were treatment naïve and 2 who received chemotherapy. In the intent to treat population the complete response rate was 27.3% at weeks 12 and 26 in the 4 mg group while 46.4% of patients receiving 8 mg had a complete response at both points. Mycobacterial cell wall-DNA complex was well tolerated by both dose groups. Overall 90% of all adverse events were mild to moderate in severity.
CONCLUSIONS: Mycobacterial cell wall-DNA complex has shown antineoplastic activity in patients with bladder cancer with less toxicity than that associated with bacillus Calmette-Guerin administration. The tolerance and efficacy of mycobacterial cell wall-DNA complex might hold promise for the treatment of carcinoma in situ of the bladder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19150551     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.11.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  21 in total

Review 1.  Management of carcinoma in situ of the bladder: best practice and recent developments.

Authors:  Dominic H Tang; Sam S Chang
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Intravesical therapy for urothelial carcinoma of the urinary bladder: a critical review.

Authors:  Daher C Chade; Shahrokh F Shariat; Guido Dalbagni
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 3.  Evolving immunotherapy strategies in urothelial cancer.

Authors:  Sam J Brancato; Keidren Lewi; Piyush K Agarwal
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2015

Review 4.  Novel immunotherapeutic approaches to the treatment of urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Akhil Muthigi; Arvin K George; Sam J Brancato; Piyush K Agarwal
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2016-02-09

Review 5.  Immune therapies in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Philip L Ho; Stephen B Williams; Ashish M Kamat
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2015-02

6.  New developments in the management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Mark D Tyson; Daniel Lee; Peter Clark
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.645

7.  The management of BCG failure in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an update.

Authors:  Alexandre R Zlotta; Neil E Fleshner; Michael A Jewett
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 8.  Natural biology and management of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Kristen R Scarpato; Mark D Tyson; Peter E Clark
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.645

Review 9.  Experience with newer intravesical chemotherapy for high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  LaMont J Barlow; Mitchell C Benson
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Advances in intravesical therapy for the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (Review).

Authors:  Michael D Weintraub; Qingdi Quentin Li; Piyush K Agarwal
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.