Literature DB >> 19150138

Otoacoustic emissions and effects of contralateral white noise stimulation on transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in diabetic children.

Aslihan Kulekci Ugur1, Yusuf Kemal Kemaloglu, Mehmet Birol Ugur, Bulent Gunduz, Cagil Saridogan, Ediz Yesilkaya, Aysun Bideci, Peyami Cinaz, Nebil Goksu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study, our aim was to determine presence of dysfunction in the efferent auditory system of children with type-I diabetes mellitus (DM) presenting no evidence of symptomatic neuropathy.
METHODS: Thirty children with type-I DM (DM group) and 31 age matched healthy children (control group) with normal hearing and middle ear function were entered to the study. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE), transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE), and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions (SOAE) measurements were performed. Then, the TEOAE recording was repeated while a continuous broadband white noise (bandwidth: 50-8000 Hz) presented at 40 dB SL was delivered to the contralateral ear for efferent auditory system suppression.
RESULTS: We found that contralateral stimulation (CS) with white noise resulted in significantly more pronounced suppression of the TEOAE response amplitude in healthy controls compared to DM group at 2000 and 4000 Hz frequencies. Further, a relatively higher percentage of the controls had suppression in at least three frequencies compared to DM group. SOAE prevalence was found to be higher in the DM group.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest presence of a dysfunction in medial olivocochlear efferent system in diabetic children. This may be regarded as an early central manifestation of diabetic neuropathy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19150138     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  6 in total

Review 1.  Cochlear efferent innervation and function.

Authors:  John J Guinan
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions: input-output functions in neonates.

Authors:  Ualace de Paula Campos; Stavros Hatzopoulos; Krzysztof Kochanek; Lech Sliwa; Henryk Skarzynski; Renata Mota Mamede Carvallo
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-10

3.  The 1.06 frequency ratio in the cochlea: evidence and outlook for a natural musical semitone.

Authors:  Andrew Bell; W Wiktor Jedrzejczak
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Effect of vitamin B12 deficiency on otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  R Karli; A Gül; B Uğur
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.124

5.  The Hyperactivity of Efferent Auditory System in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions Study.

Authors:  Noor Alaudin Abdul Wahab; Suzaily Wahab; Abdul Hamid Abdul Rahman; Dinsuhaimi Sidek; Mohd Normani Zakaria
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.505

6.  Otoacoustic emissions from ears with spontaneous activity behave differently to those without: Stronger responses to tone bursts as well as to clicks.

Authors:  W Wiktor Jedrzejczak; Krzysztof Kochanek; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.