Literature DB >> 19150114

Pseudoprogression after radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide for high-grade glioma: clinical observations and working recommendations.

Cristo Chaskis1, Bart Neyns, Alex Michotte, Mark De Ridder, Hendrik Everaert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of newly diagnosed GBM with postoperative RT and concomitant TMZ followed by 6 months of TMZ maintenance therapy has been shown to significantly improve overall survival compared with RT alone. Standard clinical assessments of these patients include Gd-MRI as well as neurologic evaluation. Frequently, patients exhibit immediate post-RT changes in enhancement on Gd-MRI that mimic tumor progression (ie, pseudoprogression or radiation-induced imaging changes). With the introduction of concomitant RT plus TMZ for treatment of malignant glioma, there appears to be an increasing incidence of pseudoprogression. CASE DESCRIPTION: In our experience, pseudoprogression after concomitant RT plus TMZ is typically not observed at first imaging immediately after completion of the therapy; but delayed focal enhancement mimicking tumor progression frequently occurs during the 6 months of maintenance therapy with TMZ. Pseudoprogression may reflect the radiosensitizing effect of TMZ during concomitant therapy, and retaining patients on treatment allows them to have enhanced survival and preserved quality of life. We observed 3 cases of pseudoprogression among 54 consecutive patients who were treated with this regimen. These patients developed pseudoprogression within 2 to 6 months after completion of concomitant RT plus TMZ, but all 3 patients completed maintenance chemotherapy and remained progression free for at least 15 months after diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: Functional imaging may improve the noninvasive diagnosis of pseudoprogression, but randomized prospective studies are needed to evaluate the real impact of pseudoprogression and validate neuroradiological techniques able to make a reliable distinction between tumor recurrence and pseudoprogression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19150114     DOI: 10.1016/j.surneu.2008.09.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Neurol        ISSN: 0090-3019


  52 in total

1.  Development of a novel animal model to differentiate radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence.

Authors:  Sanath Kumar; Ali S Arbab; Rajan Jain; Jinkoo Kim; Ana C deCarvalho; Adarsh Shankar; Tom Mikkelsen; Stephen L Brown
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Early post-bevacizumab progression on contrast-enhanced MRI as a prognostic marker for overall survival in recurrent glioblastoma: results from the ACRIN 6677/RTOG 0625 Central Reader Study.

Authors:  Jerrold L Boxerman; Zheng Zhang; Yair Safriel; Mykol Larvie; Bradley S Snyder; Rajan Jain; T Linda Chi; A Gregory Sorensen; Mark R Gilbert; Daniel P Barboriak
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 12.300

3.  Preclinical MRI: Studies of the irradiated brain.

Authors:  Joel R Garbow; Christina I Tsien; Scott C Beeman
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 4.  Switching on the lights for real-time multimodality tumor neuroimaging: The integrated positron-emission tomography/MR imaging system.

Authors:  S Bisdas; T Nägele; H-P Schlemmer; A Boss; C D Claussen; B Pichler; U Ernemann
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Pseudoprogression and pseudoresponse: imaging challenges in the assessment of posttreatment glioma.

Authors:  L C Hygino da Cruz; I Rodriguez; R C Domingues; E L Gasparetto; A G Sorensen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Diagnostic dilemma of pseudoprogression in the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastomas: the role of assessing relative cerebral blood flow volume and oxygen-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter methylation status.

Authors:  D-S Kong; S T Kim; E-H Kim; D H Lim; W S Kim; Y-L Suh; J-I Lee; K Park; J H Kim; D-H Nam
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Impact of imaging measurements on response assessment in glioblastoma clinical trials.

Authors:  David A Reardon; Karla V Ballman; Jan C Buckner; Susan M Chang; Benjamin M Ellingson
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  Diagnosis of pseudoprogression using MRI perfusion in patients with glioblastoma multiforme may predict improved survival.

Authors:  Seymur Gahramanov; Csanad Varallyay; Rose Marie Tyson; Cynthia Lacy; Rongwei Fu; Joao Prola Netto; Morad Nasseri; Tricia White; Randy L Woltjer; Sakir Humayun Gultekin; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2014-11

Review 9.  Treatment-related changes in glioblastoma: a review on the controversies in response assessment criteria and the concepts of true progression, pseudoprogression, pseudoresponse and radionecrosis.

Authors:  P D Delgado-López; E Riñones-Mena; E M Corrales-García
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.405

10.  Evaluation of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma multiforme using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging with ferumoxytol calls RANO criteria into question.

Authors:  Morad Nasseri; Seymur Gahramanov; Joao Prola Netto; Rongwei Fu; Leslie L Muldoon; Csanad Varallyay; Bronwyn E Hamilton; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 12.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.