PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular pressure values after small-incision cataract surgery using either Provisc or Viscoat, separately or in combination. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized and masked clinical study. PARTICIPANTS: 147 eyes of 147 consecutive cataract patients. METHODS: The patients were randomly assigned to receive either Provisc (P group), Viscoat (V group) or both (V+P group) andintraocular pressure was measured at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in intraocular pressure between the P and V+P group at any point in time during the follow-up period (p>0.05); however, in the V group the intraocular pressure was higher than in the other 2 groups at 1 h (p=0.005 and p=0.006 respectively) and 2 h (p<0.001 and p<0.001 respectively). In the V group, intraocular pressure was also higher than the P group at 3 h (p<0.001). Over 50% of patients from the V group had intraocular pressure values of 30 mmHg and over after 2 h and 3 h from surgery. There were no statistically significant differences between the study groups concerning the intraocular pressure values measured at 6 h, 9 h and 24 h postoperatively (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Viscoat results more frequently in high intraocular pressure values during the initial 6 h after small-incision cataract surgery with frequent cases in which the intraocular pressure could increase over 30 mmHg; therefore, close follow-up of these patients is necessary.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular pressure values after small-incision cataract surgery using either Provisc or Viscoat, separately or in combination. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized and masked clinical study. PARTICIPANTS: 147 eyes of 147 consecutive cataractpatients. METHODS: The patients were randomly assigned to receive either Provisc (P group), Viscoat (V group) or both (V+P group) and intraocular pressure was measured at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 24 h after surgery. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in intraocular pressure between the P and V+P group at any point in time during the follow-up period (p>0.05); however, in the V group the intraocular pressure was higher than in the other 2 groups at 1 h (p=0.005 and p=0.006 respectively) and 2 h (p<0.001 and p<0.001 respectively). In the V group, intraocular pressure was also higher than the P group at 3 h (p<0.001). Over 50% of patients from the V group had intraocular pressure values of 30 mmHg and over after 2 h and 3 h from surgery. There were no statistically significant differences between the study groups concerning the intraocular pressure values measured at 6 h, 9 h and 24 h postoperatively (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Viscoat results more frequently in high intraocular pressure values during the initial 6 h after small-incision cataract surgery with frequent cases in which the intraocular pressure could increase over 30 mmHg; therefore, close follow-up of these patients is necessary.