W P Martins1, D A Barra, F M P Gallarreta, C O Nastri, F M Filho. 1. Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo and Escola de Ultra-sonografia de Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil. wpmartins@gmail.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of two- and three-dimensional ultrasonographic measurement of the thickness of the lower uterine segment (LUS) in pregnant women by transvaginal and transabdominal approaches. METHODS: This was a study of 30 pregnant women who had had at least one previous Cesarean section and were between 36 and 39 weeks' gestation, with singleton pregnancies in cephalic presentation. Sonographic examinations were performed by two observers using both 4-7-MHz transabdominal and 5-8-MHz transvaginal volumetric probes. LUS measurements were performed using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound, evaluating the entire LUS thickness transabdominally and the LUS muscular thickness transvaginally. Each observer measured the LUS four times by each method. Reliability was analyzed by comparing the mean of the absolute differences, the intraclass correlation coefficients, the 95% limits of agreement and the proportion of differences < 1 mm. RESULTS: Transvaginal ultrasound provided greater reliability in LUS measurements than did transabdominal ultrasound. The use of three-dimensional ultrasound improved significantly the reliability of the LUS muscular thickness measurement obtained transvaginally. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonographic measurement of the LUS muscular thickness transvaginally appears more reliable than does that of the entire LUS thickness transabdominally. The use of three-dimensional ultrasound should be considered to improve measurement reliability. (c) 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability of two- and three-dimensional ultrasonographic measurement of the thickness of the lower uterine segment (LUS) in pregnant women by transvaginal and transabdominal approaches. METHODS: This was a study of 30 pregnant women who had had at least one previous Cesarean section and were between 36 and 39 weeks' gestation, with singleton pregnancies in cephalic presentation. Sonographic examinations were performed by two observers using both 4-7-MHz transabdominal and 5-8-MHz transvaginal volumetric probes. LUS measurements were performed using two- and three-dimensional ultrasound, evaluating the entire LUS thickness transabdominally and the LUS muscular thickness transvaginally. Each observer measured the LUS four times by each method. Reliability was analyzed by comparing the mean of the absolute differences, the intraclass correlation coefficients, the 95% limits of agreement and the proportion of differences < 1 mm. RESULTS: Transvaginal ultrasound provided greater reliability in LUS measurements than did transabdominal ultrasound. The use of three-dimensional ultrasound improved significantly the reliability of the LUS muscular thickness measurement obtained transvaginally. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonographic measurement of the LUS muscular thickness transvaginally appears more reliable than does that of the entire LUS thickness transabdominally. The use of three-dimensional ultrasound should be considered to improve measurement reliability. (c) 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: N Chaillet; E Bujold; B Masse; W A Grobman; P Rozenberg; J C Pasquier; A Shorten; M Johri; F Beaudoin; H Abenhaim; S Demers; W Fraser; M Dugas; S Blouin; E Dubé; R Gauthier Journal: Trials Date: 2017-09-20 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Ayman Shehata Dawood; Adel Elgergawy; Ahmed Elhalwagy; Walid M Ataallah; Shereen B Elbohoty; Shereef L Elshwaikh; Amal A Elsokary; Ahmed M Elkhyat; Amr T Elbadry; Ahmed M Abbas Journal: Int J Womens Health Date: 2019-01-10