| Literature DB >> 19148403 |
Marcelo Matida Hamata1, Paulo Renato Junqueira Zuim, Alicio Rosalino Garcia.
Abstract
Fabrication of occlusal splints in centric relation for temporomandibular disorders (TMD) patients is arguable, since this position has been defined for asymptomatic stomatognathic system. Thus, maximum intercuspation might be employed in patients with occlusal stability, eliminating the need for interocclusal records. This study compared occlusal splints fabricated in centric relation and maximum intercuspation in muscle pain reduction of TMD patients. Twenty patients with TMD of myogenous origin and bruxism were divided into 2 groups treated with splints in maximum intercuspation (I) or centric relation (II). Clinical, electrognathographic and electromyographic examinations were performed before and 3 months after therapy. Data were analyzed by the Student's t test. Differences at 5% level of probability were considered statistically significant. There was a remarkable reduction in pain symptomatology, without statistically significant differences (p>0.05) between the groups. There was mandibular repositioning during therapy, as demonstrated by the change in occlusal contacts on the splints. Electrognathographic examination demonstrated a significant increase in maximum left lateral movement for group I and right lateral movement for group II (p<0.05). There were no significant differences (p>0.05) in the electromyographic activities at rest after utilization of both splints. In conclusion, both occlusal splints were effective for pain control and presented similar action. The results suggest that maximum intercuspation may be used for fabrication of occlusal splints in patients with occlusal stability without large discrepancies between centric relation and maximum intercuspation. Moreover, this technique is simpler and less expensive.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19148403 PMCID: PMC4327611 DOI: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000100007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Oral Sci ISSN: 1678-7757 Impact factor: 2.698
Percentage of reduction in intensity, frequency and duration of pain symptoms and period of pain in groups I (MI) and II (CR), and initial and final values of pain intensity, frequency and duration in parentheses
| Pat. | Intensity %R (VAS/0-10) | Frequency %R (days/week) | Duration %R (hours/day) | Period (months) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MI | CR | MI | CR | MI | CR | MI | CR | |
| 1 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 57.1 | 100 | 37.5 | 36 | 2 |
| 2 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 100 | 80 | 100 | 18 | 72 |
| 3 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 100 | 96.8 | 18 | 24 |
| 4 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 6 | 24 |
| 5 | 100 | 100 | 80 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 36 | 18 |
| 6 | 100 | 100 | 80 | 33.3 | 50 | 50 | 36 | 12 |
| 7 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 12 | 8 |
| 8 | 100 | 100 | 85.7 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 6 | 48 |
| 9 | 100 | 85.7 | 100 | 50 | 100 | 87.5 | 4 | 8 |
| 10 | 100 | 33.3 | 100 | 75 | 100 | 60 | 6 | 36 |
| Mean | 100 | 91.9 | 92 | 79 | 83 | 83.1 | 17.8 | 25.2 |
| SD | - | 21 | 10.5 | 25 | 23.5 | 24.3 | 13.4 | 21.5 |
| t-test | 1.22 | 1.52 | 0.02 | - | ||||
|
| 0.2384 (ns) | 0.1436 (ns) | 0.9348(ns) | - | ||||
Pat., patient; %R, percentage of reduction; VAS, visual analogue scale; MI, maximum intercuspation; CR, centric relation; SD, standard deviation; df, degrees of freedom; P, probability; ns, non-significant.
Percentage of reduction in pain to palpation of the temporalis and masseter muscles at the right and left sides in groups I (MI) and II (CR), and initial and final values of pain to palpation in parentheses
| Pat. | Masseter %R (VAS) | Temporalis %R (VAS) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Right | Left | Right | Left | |||||
| MI | CR | MI | CR | MI | CR | MI | CR | |
| 1 | 84.3 | 72.2 | 78.3 | 72.2 | 100 | 83.1 | 94.7 | 68.2 |
| 2 | 100 | 89.2 | 88.8 | 91 | 100 | 100 | 90 | 94.3 |
| 3 | 63 | 94 | 49.3 | 93 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 4 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 87.5 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 5 | 80.5 | 72.2 | 77.1 | 47.6 | 93.6 | 100 | 94 | 100 |
| 6 | 77.9 | 57.1 | 85 | 54 | 100 | 74 | 100 | 43.3 |
| 7 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 8 | 71.4 | 60 | 71.4 | 61.1 | 88.3 | 70 | 83.3 | 76.9 |
| 9 | 89.6 | 84.1 | 100 | 87.7 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 10 | 100 | 55.2 | 100 | 74 | 100 | 87.7 | 100 | 67.9 |
| Mean | 86.6 | 78.4 | 84.9 | 78 | 96.9 | 91.4 | 96.2 | 85 |
| SD | 13,4 | 17.4 | 16.6 | 19.1 | 5.1 | 11.9 | 5.7 | 19.9 |
| t-test | 1.19 | 0.87 | 1.33 | 1.69 | ||||
| df=18 | 0.2494 (ns) | 0.5974 (ns) | 0.1992 (ns) | 0.1042 (ns) | ||||
Pat., patient; %R, percentage of reduction; VAS, visual analogue scale; MI, maximum intercuspation; CR = centric relation; SD, standard deviation; df, degrees of freedom; P, probability; ns, non-significant.
Amplitude of mandibular movements before and after treatment of patients in group I (MI) and group II (CR)
| Pat. | MMO | Protrusion | RLM | LLM | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MI | CR | MI | CR | MI | CR | MI | CR | |||||||||
| B | A | B | A | B | A | B | A | B | A | B | A | B | A | B | A | |
| 1 | 46.4 | 54.6 | 51.7 | 48.8 | 9.1 | 8.1 | 4.7 | 5.6 | 10.6 | 10.3 | 7.8 | 8.1 | 10 | 9.7 | 5.6 | 6.2 |
| 2 | 49.5 | 45.8 | 46.2 | 55.7 | 7.8 | 8.4 | 5.3 | 5.3 | 9.7 | 10.3 | 7.2 | 7.8 | 7.8 | 10.3 | 7.8 | 6.9 |
| 3 | 47.5 | 49.9 | 52 | 48.3 | 5.3 | 7.8 | 7.5 | 8.8 | 8.8 | 5.9 | 6.2 | 8.4 | 6.9 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 9.4 |
| 4 | 51.3 | 50.1 | 48.6 | 55.2 | 5.9 | 7.8 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 6.9 | 8.4 | 3.4 | 5.0 | 6.9 | 8.8 |
| 5 | 43.6 | 44.3 | 40.7 | 40.6 | 4.7 | 6.9 | 6.6 | 5.6 | 3.1 | 5.9 | 3.8 | 8.8 | 4.1 | 7.8 | 7.2 | 6.2 |
| 6 | 51.3 | 46 | 47.7 | 41.7 | 8.8 | 8.8 | 7.5 | 6.2 | 5.9 | 9.4 | 9.7 | 9.4 | 7.8 | 9.1 | 10 | 9.1 |
| 7 | 46.2 | 49.3 | 48.6 | 49.1 | 9.4 | 8.1 | 9.7 | 6.9 | 9.4 | 8.1 | 7.2 | 16.2 | 10 | 10 | 8.8 | 15.3 |
| 8 | 57.1 | 56.5 | 47.3 | 51.7 | 5.9 | 6.2 | 4.1 | 5.6 | 7.2 | 6.2 | 6.9 | 9.4 | 8.8 | 9.7 | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| 9 | 45 | 46.7 | 49.1 | 51.8 | 9.1 | 8.1 | 7.2 | 7.5 | 10 | 9.7 | 9.4 | 10.3 | 10 | 8.8 | 9.1 | 10.3 |
| 10 | 50.4 | 48.1 | 47.7 | 49.8 | 8.1 | 9.4 | 8.1 | 6.9 | 7.8 | 10 | 6.9 | 7.8 | 6.9 | 9.1 | 8.8 | 9.4 |
| Mean | 48.8 | 49.1 | 47.9 | 49.2 | 7.4 | 7.9 | 6.6 | 6.4 | 7.6 | 7.9 | 7.2 | 9.4 | 7.5 | 8.7 | 7.9 | 8.9 |
| SD | 3.9 | 3.9 | 3.1 | 4.9 | 1.7 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 1.6 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 2.6 |
| t-test | 0.25 | 0.85 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 2.55 | 2.46 | 1.41 | ||||||||
| df=9 | 0.7968 (ns) | 0.5780 (ns) | 0.2428 (ns) | 0.6064 (ns) | 0.6486 (ns) | 0.0298 | 0.0346 | 0.1906 (ns) | ||||||||
Pat., patient; MMO, maximum mouth opening; RLM, right lateral movement; LLM, left lateral movement, B, before; A, after; SD, standard deviation; df, degrees of freedom; P, probability; ns, non-significant;
statistically significant at 5%.
Electromyographic activity in μV of the masseter and anterior temporalis muscles for group I (MI) e group II (CR) at rest, before and after treatment
| Pat. | MMO | Protrusion | RLM | LLM | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MI | CR | MI | CR | MI | CR | MI | CR | |||||||||
| B | A | B | A | B | A | B | A | B | A | B | A | B | A | B | A | |
| 1 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 2.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 2.0 | 2.7 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 2.7 |
| 2 | 1.6 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 11 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 2.1 |
| 3 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 3.1 | 1.2 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 2.6 | 1.5 | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 4 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 3.2 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 2.8 | 3.9 | 2.6 |
| 5 | 1.3 | 1.8 | 3.3 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 2.9 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 1.3 |
| 6 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 7 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 1.0 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| 8 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 9 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 3.7 | 1.5 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 2.6 | 1.6 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
| 10 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 |
| Mean | 1.5 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.7 |
| SD | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 |
| t-test | 0.85 | 1.94 | 0.43 | 0.06 | 0.30 | 1.23 | 1.31 | 0.24 | ||||||||
| df=9 | 0.5806 | 0.0820 | 0.6794 | 0.9082 | 0.7624 | 0.2500 | 0.2208 | 0.7986 | ||||||||
Pat., patient; B, before; A, after; SD, standard deviation; df, degrees of freedom; P, probability; ns, non-significant.