Literature DB >> 19148025

Patient satisfaction: how do qualitative comments relate to quantitative scores on a satisfaction survey?

Nicole R Santuzzi1, Melanie S Brodnik, Laurie Rinehart-Thompson, Maryanna Klatt.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to determine whether there are differences in how patients quantitatively rate their inpatient service in a given section of a patient satisfaction survey based on the types of qualitative comments they make about that given section.
METHODS: The population under study was patients discharged from The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute at Ohio State University from April 1 to June 30, 2006. A sample of 1468 questionnaires was mailed. A total of 446 completed questionnaires were returned for a response rate of 30%, and 1068 comments were offered by the respondents.
RESULTS: An analysis of variance determined statistically significant differences between the ratings and the comment types in all 10 sections of the survey. A Bonferroni post hoc test revealed that the scale ratings were higher for patients who made positive comments than for patients who made negative comments for 8 of the 10 survey sections. A positive comment produced a higher mean score than did a negative comment.
CONCLUSION: The study results offer empirical evidence that there are differences in how patients quantitatively rate the services received in a hospital based on patient comment types. Hospital staff interpreting patient satisfaction survey results could say that negative comments produce lower quantitative ratings than do positive comments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19148025     DOI: 10.1097/01.QMH.0000344589.61971.41

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Manag Health Care        ISSN: 1063-8628            Impact factor:   0.926


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of telephone with World Wide Web-based responses by parents and teens to a follow-up survey after injury.

Authors:  Frederick P Rivara; Thomas D Koepsell; Jin Wang; Dennis Durbin; Kenneth M Jaffe; Monica Vavilala; Andrea Dorsch; Maria Roper-Caldbeck; Eileen Houseknecht; Nancy Temkin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The use of hospital consumer assessment of healthcare services and the Press Ganey medical practice surveys in guiding surgical patient care practices.

Authors:  Gordon Mao; Michael Joseph Gigliotti; Derrick Dupre
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-07-18

3.  Investigating the meaning of 'good' or 'very good' patient evaluations of care in English general practice: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Jenni Burt; Jenny Newbould; Gary Abel; Marc N Elliott; Julia Beckwith; Nadia Llanwarne; Natasha Elmore; Antoinette Davey; Chris Gibbons; John Campbell; Martin Roland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and clinical quality of care measures for US hospitals: results from an observational study.

Authors:  Martin Emmert; Nina Meszmer; Mark Schlesinger
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Patient evaluation of hospital outcomes: an analysis of open-ended comments from extreme clusters in a national survey.

Authors:  Hilde Hestad Iversen; Oyvind Andresen Bjertnæs; Kjersti Eeg Skudal
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  A Multifaceted Organizational Physician Assessment Program: Validity Evidence and Implications for the Use of Performance Data.

Authors:  Andrea N Leep Hunderfund; Yoon Soo Park; Frederic W Hafferty; Kelly M Nowicki; Steven I Altchuler; Darcy A Reed
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes       Date:  2017-07-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.