BACKGROUND: Although congestive heart failure (CHF) is a primary target for disease management programs, previous studies have generated mixed results regarding the effectiveness and cost savings of disease management when applied to CHF. OBJECTIVE: We estimated the long-term impact of systolic heart failure disease management from the results of an 18-month clinical trial. METHODS: We used data generated from the trial (starting population distributions, resource utilization, mortality rates, and transition probabilities) in a Markov model to project results of continuing the disease management program for the patients' lifetimes. Outputs included distribution of illness severity, mortality, resource consumption, and the cost of resources consumed. Both cost and effectiveness were discounted at a rate of 3% per year. Cost-effectiveness was computed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: Model results were validated against trial data and indicated that, over their lifetimes, patients experienced a lifespan extension of 51 days. Combined discounted lifetime program and medical costs were $4850 higher in the disease management group than the control group, but the program had a favorable long-term discounted cost-effectiveness of $43,650/QALY. These results are robust to assumptions regarding mortality rates, the impact of aging on the cost of care, the discount rate, utility values, and the targeted population. CONCLUSIONS: Estimation of the clinical benefits and financial burden of disease management can be enhanced by model-based analyses to project costs and effectiveness. Our results suggest that disease management of heart failure patients can be cost-effective over the long term.
BACKGROUND: Although congestive heart failure (CHF) is a primary target for disease management programs, previous studies have generated mixed results regarding the effectiveness and cost savings of disease management when applied to CHF. OBJECTIVE: We estimated the long-term impact of systolic heart failure disease management from the results of an 18-month clinical trial. METHODS: We used data generated from the trial (starting population distributions, resource utilization, mortality rates, and transition probabilities) in a Markov model to project results of continuing the disease management program for the patients' lifetimes. Outputs included distribution of illness severity, mortality, resource consumption, and the cost of resources consumed. Both cost and effectiveness were discounted at a rate of 3% per year. Cost-effectiveness was computed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. RESULTS: Model results were validated against trial data and indicated that, over their lifetimes, patients experienced a lifespan extension of 51 days. Combined discounted lifetime program and medical costs were $4850 higher in the disease management group than the control group, but the program had a favorable long-term discounted cost-effectiveness of $43,650/QALY. These results are robust to assumptions regarding mortality rates, the impact of aging on the cost of care, the discount rate, utility values, and the targeted population. CONCLUSIONS: Estimation of the clinical benefits and financial burden of disease management can be enhanced by model-based analyses to project costs and effectiveness. Our results suggest that disease management of heart failurepatients can be cost-effective over the long term.
Authors: Robb D Kociol; John R Horton; Gregg C Fonarow; Eric M Reyes; Linda K Shaw; Christopher M O'Connor; G Michael Felker; Adrian F Hernandez Journal: Circ Heart Fail Date: 2011-07-08 Impact factor: 8.790
Authors: Alexander Goehler; Benjamin P Geisler; Jennifer M Manne; Beate Jahn; Annette Conrads-Frank; Petra Schnell-Inderst; G Scott Gazelle; Uwe Siebert Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Yanhong Li; Wayne C Levy; Matthew P Neilson; Stephen J Ellis; David J Whellan; Kevin A Schulman; Christopher M O'Connor; Shelby D Reed Journal: J Card Fail Date: 2014-06-02 Impact factor: 5.712
Authors: Shelby D Reed; Matthew P Neilson; Matthew Gardner; Yanhong Li; Andrew H Briggs; Daniel E Polsky; Felicia L Graham; Margaret T Bowers; Sara C Paul; Bradi B Granger; Kevin A Schulman; David J Whellan; Barbara Riegel; Wayne C Levy Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: I Vaartjes; A W Hoes; J B Reitsma; A de Bruin; D E Grobbee; A Mosterd; M I Bots Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-10-22 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Oleg Borisenko; Michael Haude; Uta C Hoppe; Tomasz Siminiak; Janusz Lipiecki; Steve L Goldberg; Nawzer Mehta; Omari V Bouknight; Staffan Bjessmo; David G Reuter Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord Date: 2015-05-14 Impact factor: 2.298
Authors: Praveen Thokala; Hassan Baalbaki; Alan Brennan; Abdullah Pandor; John W Stevens; Tim Gomersall; Jenny Wang; Ameet Bakhai; Abdallah Al-Mohammad; John Cleland; Martin R Cowie; Ruth Wong Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 2.692