Literature DB >> 19147800

What was useful about that session? Clients' and therapists' comments after sessions in the UK Alcohol Treatment Trial (UKATT).

Jim Orford1, Ray Hodgson, Alex Copello, Mya Krishnan, Marta de Madariaga, Simon Coulton.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to report and contrast the aspects of two therapies considered by clients and therapists to be most and least useful.
METHOD: In the UK Alcohol Treatment Trial (UKATT), 742 clients were treated by 49 therapists with up to three sessions of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) or up to eight sessions of social behaviour and network therapy (SBNT). After each treatment session, clients and therapists were asked to independently complete two sentences, one inviting a statement about the 'most useful' and the other about the 'least useful' thing that had happened during the session.
RESULTS: The proportion of 'most useful' sentences completed was greater than the proportion of 'least useful' and equally so for MET and SBNT. The content of comments was significantly different for the two treatments: more comments on social aspects followed SBNT and more motivational comments followed MET, with larger numbers of comments following both treatments that were more general. Clients more often completed 'most useful' sentences than therapists and less often completed 'least useful' sentences. There were a number of differences in the content of their comments: notably more 'most useful' client comments about talking to their therapists, and more therapist comments about client engagement.
CONCLUSIONS: MET and SBNT left distinct impressions on the participants immediately following treatment sessions, adding to the evidence that they are different treatments, and hence deepening the mystery about why outcomes following the two treatments were so similar [UKATT Research Team. (2005) Br Med J 331: 541-58].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19147800     DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agn112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol        ISSN: 0735-0414            Impact factor:   2.826


  5 in total

1.  Do brief alcohol motivational interventions work like we think they do?

Authors:  Nicolas Bertholet; Tibor Palfai; Jacques Gaume; Jean-Bernard Daeppen; Richard Saitz
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  The impact of significant others in motivational enhancement therapy: findings from project MATCH.

Authors:  Jennifer K Manuel; Jon M Houck; Theresa B Moyers
Journal:  Behav Cogn Psychother       Date:  2011-11-03

Review 3.  Motivational interviewing for substance abuse.

Authors:  Geir Smedslund; Rigmor C Berg; Karianne T Hammerstrøm; Asbjørn Steiro; Kari A Leiknes; Helene M Dahl; Kjetil Karlsen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-05-11

4.  What works for patients in outpatient treatment for alcohol addiction? An explorative study into clients' evaluation of subjective factors and therapy satisfaction.

Authors:  Katrin M Frick; Barbara Loessl; Rigo K Brueck; Levente Kriston; Andreas Jaehne; Dieter Riemann; Horst Gann; Anil Batra; Norbert Wodarz; Karl F Mann; Michael M Berner
Journal:  Subst Abuse       Date:  2011-05-29

5.  A randomised controlled feasibility trial of family and social network intervention for young people who misuse alcohol and drugs: study protocol (Y-SBNT).

Authors:  Judith Watson; Donna Back; Paul Toner; Charlie Lloyd; Ed Day; Louca-Mai Brady; Lorna Templeton; Sangeeta Ambegaokar; Steve Parrott; David Torgerson; Kim Cocks; Eilish Gilvarry; Paul McArdle; Alex Copello
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2015-03-13
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.