Literature DB >> 1914747

Venous and neural invasion as predictors of recurrence in rectal adenocarcinoma.

A Horn1, O Dahl, I Morild.   

Abstract

After radical surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma, the presence of venous and neural invasion of tumor cells was correlated with the pattern of treatment failure, local in the pelvis or distant. Of 128 operation specimens, venous and neural invasion was demonstrated in 22 percent and 32 percent, respectively. A significant decrease of the distant recurrence-free 5-year survival (Kaplan-Meier method) was seen when venous invasion was demonstrated (32.9 percent vs. 84.3 percent; P less than 0.0001), whereas more local failures were registered in patients with neural invasion. The local recurrence-free 5-year survival in patients with neural invasion was 64.3 percent, compared with 81.1 percent when neural invasion was not demonstrated (P = 0.03). Their prognostic value was then studied in a Cox regression model including stage and grade. Neural invasion had the strongest association with local recurrences, whereas venous invasion was found to be the third strongest independent predictor of metastasis, after lymph node status and extent of local tumor infiltration. We conclude that examining for the presence of venous and neural invasion gives reliable prediction of recurrences after radical resection of rectal cancer. Recording of tumor recurrence pattern may lead to a better selection of patients for adjuvant therapy after surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1914747     DOI: 10.1007/bf02051074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  35 in total

Review 1.  Management of rectal cancer.

Authors:  James S Wu; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Perineural invasion and associated pain in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Aditi A Bapat; Galen Hostetter; Daniel D Von Hoff; Haiyong Han
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Systematic review of prognostic importance of extramural venous invasion in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Manish Chand; Muhammed R S Siddiqui; Ian Swift; Gina Brown
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  The benefits of elastic[corrected]--no stretch of the imagination [corrected].

Authors:  G Smith; N Waddell; A Riley
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Challenges in the management of stage II colon cancer.

Authors:  Efrat Dotan; Steven J Cohen
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  Lymphovascular invasion in colorectal cancer: an interobserver variability study.

Authors:  Elizabeth I Harris; David N Lewin; Hanlin L Wang; Gregory Y Lauwers; Amitabh Srivastava; Yu Shyr; Bashar Shakhtour; Frank Revetta; Mary K Washington
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 7.  Perineural growth in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a review.

Authors:  Joseph Roh; Thomas Muelleman; Ossama Tawfik; Sufi M Thomas
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 8.  MRI of Rectal Cancer: Tumor Staging, Imaging Techniques, and Management.

Authors:  Natally Horvat; Camila Carlos Tavares Rocha; Brunna Clemente Oliveira; Iva Petkovska; Marc J Gollub
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 5.333

9.  Predicting factors of postoperative relapse in T2-4N0M0 colorectal cancer patients via harvesting a minimum of 12 lymph nodes.

Authors:  Hsiang-Lin Tsai; Yung-Sung Yeh; Fang-Jung Yu; Chien-Yu Lu; Chin-Fan Chen; Chao-Wen Chen; Yu-Tang Chang; Jaw-Yuan Wang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Proforma-based reporting in rectal cancer.

Authors:  F Taylor; N Mangat; I R Swift; G Brown
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.