Literature DB >> 19147410

Health economics of contraception.

Ifigeneia Mavranezouli1.   

Abstract

Unintended pregnancies constitute a global problem associated with substantial costs to health and social services, and emotional distress to women, their families and society as a whole. Provision of contraception has been demonstrated to be a particularly cost-effective healthcare intervention as, besides preventing a significant number of unintended pregnancies, it also results in great cost-savings to society. Male and female sterilization and long-acting reversible methods (such as the copper-T intra-uterine device and the subdermal implant) constitute the most cost-effective contraceptive options, followed by other hormonal methods (such as oral contraceptives); barrier and behavioural methods (such as the male condom and withdrawal, respectively) are least cost-effective compared with other contraceptive options. Nevertheless, when compared with no method, they still prevent a large number of unintended pregnancies, thus leading to important cost-savings. Improvements in compliance and continuation rates are expected to further enhance the contraceptive benefits and cost-savings associated with contraceptive use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19147410     DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2008.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 1521-6934            Impact factor:   5.237


  7 in total

Review 1.  Contraceptive methods and risk of HIV acquisition or female-to-male transmission.

Authors:  Lisa B Haddad; Chelsea B Polis; Anandi N Sheth; Jennifer Brown; Athena P Kourtis; Caroline King; Rana Chakraborty; Igho Ofotokun
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.071

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) 13.5 mg in contraception.

Authors:  James Trussell; Fareen Hassan; Nathaniel Henry; Jennifer Pocoski; Amy Law; Anna Filonenko
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Emergency Hormonal Contraception with Ulipristal Acetate versus Levonorgestrel for Minors in France.

Authors:  Ramona Schmid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Rationale, design, and cohort enrolment of a prospective observational study of the clinical performance of the new contraceptive implant (Femplant) in Pakistan.

Authors:  Syed Khurram Azmat; Waqas Hameed; Anja Lendvay; Babar Tasneem Shaikh; Ghulam Mustafa; Muhammad Ahmed Siddiqui; Sajid Brohi; Asif Karim; Muhammad Ishaque; Wajahat Hussain; Mohsina Bilgrami; Paul J Feldblum
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-05-29

5.  Is contraceptive self-injection cost-effective compared to contraceptive injections from facility-based health workers? Evidence from Uganda.

Authors:  Laura Di Giorgio; Mercy Mvundura; Justine Tumusiime; Chloe Morozoff; Jane Cover; Jennifer Kidwell Drake
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.375

6.  Development of a pharmacoeconomic registry: an example using hormonal contraceptives.

Authors:  Annesha White; Meenakshi Srinivasan; La Marcus Wingate; Samuel Peasah; Marc Fleming
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2021-03-20

7.  Unintended pregnancy, contraceptive use, and childbearing desires among HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women in Botswana: across-sectional study.

Authors:  Gloria K Mayondi; Kathleen Wirth; Chelsea Morroni; Sikhulile Moyo; Gbolahan Ajibola; Modiegi Diseko; Maureen Sakoi; Jane Dipuo Magetse; Kebaiphe Moabi; Jean Leidner; Joseph Makhema; Betsy Kammerer; Shahin Lockman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 3.295

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.