Literature DB >> 19147043

The effect of ventricular assist devices on post-transplant mortality an analysis of the United network for organ sharing thoracic registry.

Vishnu Patlolla1, Richard D Patten, David Denofrio, Marvin A Konstam, Rajan Krishnamani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the relationship between pre-transplant ventricular assist device (VAD) support and mortality after heart transplantation.
BACKGROUND: Increasingly, VADs are being used to bridge patients to heart transplantation. The effect of these devices on post-transplant mortality is unclear.
METHODS: Patients 18 years or older who underwent first-time, single-organ heart transplantation in the U.S. between 1995 and 2004 were included in the analyses. This study compared 1,433 patients bridged with intracorporeal and 448 patients bridged with extracorporeal VADs with 9,455 United Network for Organ Sharing status 1 patients not bridged with a VAD with respect to post-transplant mortality. Because the proportional hazards assumption was not met, hazard ratios (HRs) for different time periods were estimated.
RESULTS: Intracorporeal VADs were associated with an HR of 1.20 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02 to 1.43; p = 0.03) for mortality in the first 6 months after transplant and an HR of 1.99 (95% CI: 1.44 to 2.75; p < 0.0001) beyond 5 years. Between 6 months and 5 years, the HRs were not significantly different from 1. Extracorporeal VADs were associated with an HR of 1.91 (95% CI: 1.53 to 2.37; p < 0.0001) for mortality in the first 6 months and an HR of 2.93 (95% CI: 1.19 to 7.25; p = 0.02) beyond 5 years. The HRs were not significantly different from 1 between 6 months and 5 years, except for an HR of 0.23 (95% CI: 0.06 to 0.91; p = 0.04) between 24 and 36 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Extracorporeal VADs are associated with higher mortality within 6 months and again beyond 5 years after transplantation. Intracorporeal VADs are associated with a small increase in mortality in the first 6 months and a clinically significant increase in mortality beyond 5 years. These data do not provide evidence supporting VAD implantation in stable United Network for Organ Sharing status I patients awaiting heart transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19147043     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.08.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  21 in total

1.  Intervention: LVADs--from an imaginative leap to clinical decision making.

Authors:  Magdi H Yacoub
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Preliminary report on the cost effectiveness of ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Takura; Shunei Kyo; Minoru Ono; Ryuji Tominaga; Shigeru Miyagawa; Yoshihisa Tanoue; Yoshiki Sawa
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  Risk factors for early death in patients bridged to transplant with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  George J Arnaoutakis; Timothy J George; Arman Kilic; Claude A Beaty; Eric S Weiss; John V Conte; Ashish S Shah
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 4.  A ventricular assist device as a bridge to recovery, decision making, or transplantation in patients with advanced cardiac failure.

Authors:  Siyamek Neragi-Miandoab
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  Impact of Bridge to Transplantation With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices on Posttransplantation Mortality.

Authors:  Lauren K Truby; Maryjane A Farr; A Reshad Garan; Raymond Givens; Susan W Restaino; Farhana Latif; Hiroo Takayama; Yoshifumi Naka; Koji Takeda; Veli K Topkara
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Short-term mechanical circulatory support as bridge to heart transplantation: paracorporeal ventricular assist device as alternative to extracorporeal life support.

Authors:  Sandro Sponga; Giovanni Benedetti; Ugolino Livi
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-01

Review 7.  Left ventricular assist devices and other devices for end-stage heart failure: utility of echocardiography.

Authors:  James N Kirkpatrick; Susan E Wiegers; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  Left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Christopher T Holley; Laura Harvey; Ranjit John
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Impact of long term left ventricular assist device therapy on donor allocation in cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Nir Uriel; Ulrich P Jorde; Sang Woo Pak; Jeff Jiang; Kevin Clerkin; Hiroo Takayama; Yoshifumi Naka; P Christian Schulze; Donna M Mancini
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 10.247

10.  Ventricular assist devices or inotropic agents in status 1A patients? Survival analysis of the United Network of Organ Sharing database.

Authors:  Curtis J Wozniak; Josef Stehlik; Bradley C Baird; Stephen H McKellar; Howard K Song; Stavros G Drakos; Craig H Selzman
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.