Literature DB >> 19145522

Willingness to pay for lives saved by Helicopter Emergency Medical Services.

Akkie N Ringburg1, Martina Buljac, Elly A Stolk, Esther M M van Lieshout, Ed F van Beeck, Peter Patka, Inger B Schipper.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Currently, policy makers in the Netherlands are discussing the possibility to expand the availability of Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) from 12 hours to 24 hours per day. For this, the preferences of the general public towards both the positive effects and negative consequences of HEMS should be taken into account. Therefore, the willingness to pay (WTP) for lives saved by HEMS was calculated.
METHODS: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was performed in order to explore the preferences of respondents towards (expansion of) HEMS availability. The attributes: costs (for HEMS) per household number of additional lives saved (by HEMS), number of noise disturbances (caused by HEMS) during day time or night time were used. A written questionnaire was presented to 150 individuals by convenience sampling. RESULT: One hundred and thirty-six (91%) of the 150 individuals completed the DCE questionnaire. The marginal WTP for one additional life saved (in a month) was euro 3.43 (95% CI; 2.96-3.90) per month per household. Overall, the WTP for expansion to a 24-hour availability of HEMS can therefore be estimated at euro 12.29 ( approximately US$ 17.50) per household per month.
CONCLUSION: The WTP derived from this study is by far exceeding the 1-1.5 Million-euro necessary per HEMS per year for the expansion from a daytime HEMS to a 24-h availability in the Netherlands. Respondents are willing to pay for lives saved by HEMS in spite of increases in flights and concurrent noise disturbances. These results may be helpful for the decision-making process, and may provide a positive argument for the expansion of HEMS availability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19145522     DOI: 10.1080/10903120802472004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  2 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of stated preference studies reporting public preferences for healthcare priority setting.

Authors:  Jennifer A Whitty; Emily Lancsar; Kylie Rixon; Xanthe Golenko; Julie Ratcliffe
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Willingness to pay for municipality hospital services in rural Japan: a contingent valuation study.

Authors:  Takayoshi Terashita; Hiroshi Muto; Toshihito Nakamura; Katsuhiko Ogasawara; Masaji Maezawa
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-06-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.