| Literature DB >> 19145224 |
Katie Mahon1, Jinghui Wu, Anil K Malhotra, Katherine E Burdick, Pamela DeRosse, Babak A Ardekani, Philip R Szeszko.
Abstract
There is evidence from post-mortem and magnetic resonance imaging studies that hyperintensities, oligodendroglial abnormalities, and gross white matter volumetric alterations are involved in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder. There is also functional imaging evidence for a defect in frontal cortico-subcortical pathways in bipolar disorder, but the white matter comprising these pathways has not been well investigated. Few studies have investigated white matter integrity in patients with bipolar disorder compared to healthy volunteers and the majority of studies have used manual region-of-interest approaches. In this study, we compared fractional anisotropy (FA) values between 30 patients with bipolar disorder and 38 healthy volunteers in the brain white matter using a voxelwise analysis following intersubject registration to Talairach space. Compared to healthy volunteers, patients demonstrated significantly (p<0.001; cluster size > or =50) higher FA within the right and left frontal white matter and lower FA within the left cerebellar white matter. Examination of individual eigenvalues indicated that group differences in both axial diffusivity and radial diffusivity contributed to abnormal FA within these regions. Tractography was performed in template space on averaged diffusion tensor imaging data from all individuals. Extraction of bundles passing through the clusters that differed significantly between groups suggested that white matter abnormalities along the pontine crossing tract, corticospinal/corticopontine tracts, and thalamic radiation fibers may be involved in the pathogenesis of bipolar disorder. Our findings are consistent with models of bipolar disorder that implicate dysregulation of cortico-subcortical and cerebellar regions in the disorder and may have relevance for phenomenology.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19145224 PMCID: PMC2811531 DOI: 10.1038/npp.2008.216
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology ISSN: 0893-133X Impact factor: 7.853
Sample Characteristics
| Bipolar | Healthy | df | Test | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 33.4 (8.7) | 31.9 (8.6) | 66 | t = .74 | ns |
| Sex (M/F) | 15/15 | 22/16 | 1 | X2 = .42 | ns |
| Parental Social Class | 2.8 (1.1) | 2.6 (.86) | 1 | t = .88 | ns |
| Laterality Quotient | .79 (.39) | .75 (.59) | 63 | t = .34 | ns |
| Race | 18,5,2,4,1 | 15,14,2,6,1 | 2 | X2 = 3.90 | ns |
| Years of Education | 14.6 (2.2) | 15.5 (2.0) | 64 | t = −1.62 | ns |
Notes. Data are presented as mean +/− SD in parentheses, unless otherwise indicated. There were data missing for the following variables: parental social class (1 patient), laterality quotient (2 patients, 1 healthy volunteer), and years of education (2 patients).
Hollingshead Redlich Scale rated on a scale from 1 (highest) to 5 (lowest).
Race coded as Caucasian, African American, Hispanic, Asian, and other. Because more than 20% of the categories for race had expected frequencies of less than 5 we combined the latter three groups (i.e., Hispanic, Asian, and other) into a single group for analysis.
Figure 1Average FA Maps for patients (top row) and healthy controls (bottom row). Images from left to right correspond to −5 mm below the AC-PC plane and 5, 15, 25, 35 and 45 mm above the AC-PC.
Figure 2Average SPGR images corresponding to −5 mm below the AC-PC plane and 5, 15, 25, 35 and 45 mm above the AC-PC plane.
Mean Fractional Anisotropy Values for Patients and Healthy Volunteers
| Brain Region | Bipolar | Healthy | Talairach | Cluster | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X | Y | Z | ||||
| Left Hemisphere | ||||||
| Cluster 1 | 283.15 | 337.90 | −14 | −43 | −21 | 50 |
| Cluster 2 | 338.36 | 300.90 | −24 | 3 | 24 | 83 |
| Right Hemisphere | ||||||
| Cluster 3 | 278.07 | 240.08 | 24 | 4 | 20 | 126 |
| Cluster 4 | 267.15 | 227.49 | 34 | −3 | 29 | 191 |
Notes: Data are presented as mean +/− SD in parentheses. Fractional anisotropy values are multiplied by a factor of 1000.
Talairach coordinates represent the centroid of the region.
Cluster size is reported as number of voxels.
Figure 3White matter regions where FA was significantly (p < 001; 50 voxels) different in patients compared to healthy volunteers. A description of these regions can be found in the text and Table 2.
Note: Images are in radiologic convention.
Mean Radial Diffusivity Valuesa for FA Clusters that differed between Patients and Healthy Volunteers
| Brain Region | Bipolar | Healthy | Test | df | p | Effect Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left Hemisphere | ||||||
| Cluster 1 | 2716.81 | 2570.39 | t = 3.17 | 66 | .002 | .132 |
| Cluster 2 | 2771.41 | 2898.41 | t = −3.20 | 66 | .002 | .135 |
| Right Hemisphere | ||||||
| Cluster 3 | 2818.31 | 2943.17 | t = −3.71 | 66 | <.001 | .173 |
| Cluster 4 | 2861.63 | 2938.80 | t = −2.53 | 66 | .014 | .089 |
Notes: Data are presented as mean +/− SD in parentheses.
Values are in units of µm2/s
Effect size = partial eta squared
Mean Axial Diffusivity Valuesa for FA Clusters that Differed between Patients and Healthy Volunteers
| Brain Region | Patients | Healthy | Test | df | p | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left Hemisphere | ||||||
| Cluster 1 | 4279.51 | 4470.48 | t = −2.81 | 66 | .007 | .107 |
| Cluster 2 | 4746.60 | 4630.00 | t = 1.98 | 66 | .052 | .056 |
| Right Hemisphere | ||||||
| Cluster 3 | 4324.71 | 4244.93 | t = 1.52 | 66 | .134 | .034 |
| Cluster 4 | 4229.08 | 4056.30 | t = 3.84 | 66 | <.001 | .183 |
Notes: Data are presented as mean +/− SD in parentheses.
Values are in units of µm2/s
Effect size = partial eta squared
Figure 42D images illustrating fibers passing through clusters 1–4, respectively, superimposed onto the color-coded average FA map of all subjects.
Note: Images are in radiologic convention. Fibers passing through clusters 1–4 are illustrated in red, orange, blue and yellow, respectively.
Figure 53D images illustrating fibers passing through clusters 1–4, respectively, superimposed onto the average FA map of all subjects.
Note: Fibers passing through clusters 1–4 are illustrated in red, orange, blue and yellow, respectively.