OBJECTIVE: To assess in a randomized clinical trial the influence of perioperative short-term ambroxol administration on postoperative complications, hospital stay and costsafter pulmonary lobectomy for lung cancer. METHODS:One hundred and forty consecutive patients undergoing lobectomy for lung cancer (April 2006-November 2007) were randomized in two groups. Group A (70 patients): ambroxol was administered by intravenous infusion in the context of the usual therapy on the day of operation and on the first 3 postoperative days (1000 mg/day). Group B (70 patients): fluid therapy only without ambroxol. Groups were compared in terms of occurrence of postoperative complications, length of stay and costs. RESULTS: There were no dropouts from either group and no complications related to treatment. The two groups were well matched for perioperative and operative variables. Compared to group B, group A (ambroxol) had a reduction of postoperative pulmonary complications (4 vs 13, 6% vs 19%, p=0.02), and unplanned ICU admission/readmission (1 vs 6, 1.4% vs 8.6%, p=0.1) rates. Moreover, the postoperative stay and costs were reduced by 2.5 days (5.6 vs 8.1, p=0.02) and 2765 Euro (2499 Euro vs 5264 Euro, p=0.04), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term perioperative treatment with ambroxol improved early outcome after lobectomy and may be used to implement fast-tracking policies and cut postoperative costs. Nevertheless, other independent trials are needed to verify the effect of this treatment in different settings.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To assess in a randomized clinical trial the influence of perioperative short-term ambroxol administration on postoperative complications, hospital stay and costs after pulmonary lobectomy for lung cancer. METHODS: One hundred and forty consecutive patients undergoing lobectomy for lung cancer (April 2006-November 2007) were randomized in two groups. Group A (70 patients): ambroxol was administered by intravenous infusion in the context of the usual therapy on the day of operation and on the first 3 postoperative days (1000 mg/day). Group B (70 patients): fluid therapy only without ambroxol. Groups were compared in terms of occurrence of postoperative complications, length of stay and costs. RESULTS: There were no dropouts from either group and no complications related to treatment. The two groups were well matched for perioperative and operative variables. Compared to group B, group A (ambroxol) had a reduction of postoperative pulmonary complications (4 vs 13, 6% vs 19%, p=0.02), and unplanned ICU admission/readmission (1 vs 6, 1.4% vs 8.6%, p=0.1) rates. Moreover, the postoperative stay and costs were reduced by 2.5 days (5.6 vs 8.1, p=0.02) and 2765 Euro (2499 Euro vs 5264 Euro, p=0.04), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term perioperative treatment with ambroxol improved early outcome after lobectomy and may be used to implement fast-tracking policies and cut postoperative costs. Nevertheless, other independent trials are needed to verify the effect of this treatment in different settings.