Literature DB >> 19144398

Motor resonance as a function of narrative time: further tests of the linguistic focus hypothesis.

Rolf A Zwaan1, Lawrence J Taylor, Mirte de Boer.   

Abstract

Neuroimaging and behavioral studies have revealed involvement of the brain's motor system in language comprehension. The Linguistic-Focus Hypothesis [Taylor, L. J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Motor resonance and linguistic focus. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,61, 869-904.] postulates that engagement of the motor system during language comprehension is controlled by the focus of the linguistic message. Two experiments were conducted to further test this hypothesis. They examined whether motor resonance, which has previously been found to occur on descriptions of actions occurring in the present, extends to descriptions of (1) actions potentially occurring in the future (action intentions) and (2) actions having occurred in the past. An additional goal was to examine if motor resonance occurs in a narrative context. Using the reading-by-rotation paradigm [Zwaan, R. A., & Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 1-11.], Experiment 1 found evidence for motor resonance occurring on current action descriptions embedded in a narrative, but not action intentions. Experiment 2 found evidence for motor resonance on both current and past actions. These results partly support the Linguistic-Focus Hypothesis and lead to further hypotheses about the modulation of motor activation during language comprehension. Copyright 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19144398     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  12 in total

1.  Sentence plausibility influences the link between action words and the perception of biological human movements.

Authors:  Christel Bidet-Ildei; Manuel Gimenes; Lucette Toussaint; Yves Almecija; Arnaud Badets
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-05-31

Review 2.  Language disorders in children with central nervous system injury.

Authors:  Maureen Dennis
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.475

3.  The experiential basis of compatibility effects in reading-by-rotating paradigms.

Authors:  Francesca Capuano; Berry Claus; Barbara Kaup
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-02-27

4.  The Two-Level Theory of verb meaning: An approach to integrating the semantics of action with the mirror neuron system.

Authors:  David Kemmerer; Javier Gonzalez-Castillo
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2008-11-08       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Do not resonate with actions: sentence polarity modulates cortico-spinal excitability during action-related sentence reading.

Authors:  Marco Tullio Liuzza; Matteo Candidi; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Flexibility in embodied language understanding.

Authors:  Roel M Willems; Daniel Casasanto
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-06-03

7.  Language comprehension in the balance: the robustness of the action-compatibility effect (ACE).

Authors:  Rolf A Zwaan; Nathan van der Stoep; Tulio Guadalupe; Samantha Bouwmeester
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Eye movements and mental imagery during reading of literary texts with different narrative styles.

Authors:  Lilla Magyari; Anne Mangen; Anežka Kuzmičová; Arthur M Jacobs; Jana Lüdtke
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 0.957

Review 9.  Production of Verb Tense in Agrammatic Aphasia: A Meta-Analysis and Further Data.

Authors:  Yasmeen Faroqi-Shah; Laura Friedman
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2015-09-20       Impact factor: 3.342

10.  Action relevance in linguistic context drives word-induced motor activity.

Authors:  Pia Aravena; Mélody Courson; Victor Frak; Anne Cheylus; Yves Paulignan; Viviane Deprez; Tatjana A Nazir
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.