Literature DB >> 19143800

Using the antisaccade task to investigate the relationship between the development of inhibition and the development of intelligence.

Fiona Michel1, Mike Anderson.   

Abstract

A number of authors have proposed models of cognitive development that explain improvements in intelligence over the course of childhood via changes in the efficiency of inhibitory processes (Anderson, 2001; Bjorklund & Harnishfeger, 1990; Dempster, 1991, 1992; Dempster & Corkill, 1999a; Harnishfeger, 1995; Harnishfeger & Bjorklund, 1993). A review of the literature reveals little empirical support for the thesis. This is largely due to a failure to distinguish between age-related and non-age-related changes in both inhibitory ability and intelligence. Empirical evidence is presented from a developmental study employing the antisaccade task to provide support for the role of inhibitory processes in the development of intelligence. Additionally, a case is made for a functional difference underlying antisaccade errors that are subsequently corrected and those that remain uncorrected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19143800     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00759.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  11 in total

1.  Is the relationship of prosaccade reaction times and antisaccade errors mediated by working memory?

Authors:  Trevor J Crawford; Elisabeth Parker; Ivonne Solis-Trapala; Jenny Mayes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of response preparation on developmental improvements in inhibitory control.

Authors:  Sarah Ordaz; Stephanie Davis; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-03-26

3.  Longitudinal growth curves of brain function underlying inhibitory control through adolescence.

Authors:  Sarah J Ordaz; William Foran; Katerina Velanova; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Dissociable components of cognitive control: an event-related potential (ERP) study of response inhibition and interference suppression.

Authors:  Christopher R Brydges; Karen Clunies-Ross; Madeleine Clohessy; Zhao Li Lo; An Nguyen; Claire Rousset; Patrick Whitelaw; Yit Jing Yeap; Allison M Fox
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Training attentional control in infancy.

Authors:  Sam Wass; Kaska Porayska-Pomsta; Mark H Johnson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  The relationship between the development of response inhibition and intelligence in preschool children.

Authors:  Hon Wah Lee; Yu-Hui Lo; Kuan-Hui Li; Wen-Shin Sung; Chi-Hung Juan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-11

7.  The effects of inhibitory control training for preschoolers on reasoning ability and neural activity.

Authors:  Qian Liu; Xinyi Zhu; Albert Ziegler; Jiannong Shi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Saccadic Eye Movement Abnormalities in Children with Epilepsy.

Authors:  Judith Lunn; Tim Donovan; Damien Litchfield; Charlie Lewis; Robert Davies; Trevor Crawford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Maturation of cognitive control: delineating response inhibition and interference suppression.

Authors:  Christopher R Brydges; Mike Anderson; Corinne L Reid; Allison M Fox
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Inhibitory Processes and Fluid Intelligence: a Performance at Early Years of Schooling.

Authors:  Yesica Aydmune; Isabel Introzzi; Eliana Zamora; Florencia Stelzer
Journal:  Int J Psychol Res (Medellin)       Date:  2020 Jan-Jul
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.