Literature DB >> 19142846

In silico methods for predicting metabolism and mass fragmentation applied to quetiapine in liquid chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry urine drug screening.

Anna Pelander1, Elli Tyrkkö, Ilkka Ojanperä.   

Abstract

Current in silico tools were evaluated for their ability to predict metabolism and mass spectral fragmentation in the context of analytical toxicology practice. A metabolite prediction program (Lhasa Meteor), a metabolite detection program (Bruker MetaboliteDetect), and a fragmentation prediction program (ACD/MS Fragmenter) were used to assign phase I metabolites of the antipsychotic drug quetiapine in the liquid chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC/TOFMS) accurate mass data from ten autopsy urine samples. In the literature, the main metabolic routes of quetiapine have been reported to be sulfoxidation, oxidation to the corresponding carboxylic acid, N- and O-dealkylation and hydroxylation. Of the 14 metabolites predicted by Meteor, eight were detected by LC/TOFMS in the urine samples with use of MetaboliteDetect software and manual inspection. An additional five hydroxy derivatives were detected, but not predicted by Meteor. The fragment structures provided by ACD/MS Fragmenter software confirmed the identification of the metabolites. Mean mass accuracy and isotopic pattern match (SigmaFit) values for the fragments were 2.40 ppm (0.62 mDa) and 0.010, respectively. ACD/MS Fragmenter, in particular, allowed metabolites with identical molecular formulae to be differentiated without a need to access the respective reference standards or reference spectra. This was well exemplified with the hydroxy/sulfoxy metabolites of quetiapine and their N- and O-dealkylated forms. The procedure resulted in assigning 13 quetiapine metabolites in urine. The present approach is instrumental in developing an extensive database containing exact monoisotopic masses and verified retention times of drugs and their urinary metabolites for LC/TOFMS drug screening. Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19142846     DOI: 10.1002/rcm.3901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 0951-4198            Impact factor:   2.419


  8 in total

1.  Validation of LC-TOF-MS screening for drugs, metabolites, and collateral compounds in forensic toxicology specimens.

Authors:  Fessessework Guale; Shahriar Shahreza; Jeffrey P Walterscheid; Hsin-Hung Chen; Crystal Arndt; Anna T Kelly; Ashraf Mozayani
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 3.367

2.  Xenobiotics metabolization in Salix alba leaves uncovered by mass spectrometry imaging.

Authors:  Claire Villette; Loïc Maurer; Adrien Wanko; Dimitri Heintz
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 4.290

3.  Kinetic control of protonation in electrospray ionization.

Authors:  J Richard Joyce; Don S Richards
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Advances in structure elucidation of small molecules using mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Tobias Kind; Oliver Fiehn
Journal:  Bioanal Rev       Date:  2010-08-21

5.  PROXIMAL: a method for Prediction of Xenobiotic Metabolism.

Authors:  Mona Yousofshahi; Sara Manteiga; Charmian Wu; Kyongbum Lee; Soha Hassoun
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2015-12-22

6.  Comparative Research of Chemical Profiling in Different Parts of Fissistigma oldhamii by Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Haibo Hu; Yau Lee-Fong; Jinnian Peng; Bin Hu; Jialin Li; Yaoli Li; Hao Huang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Norbuprenorphine Interferences in Urine Drug Testing LC-MS-MS Confirmation Methods from Quetiapine Metabolites.

Authors:  Ana Celia Muñoz-Muñoz; Teresa Pekol; Amber Awad; Phillip Hackett; Lynnea Sullivan; Art Rodrigues; Erin Brelsford; Richard Engert; Debra Savery; Lawrence Andrade
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 3.220

8.  Computational mass spectrometry for small molecules.

Authors:  Kerstin Scheubert; Franziska Hufsky; Sebastian Böcker
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.514

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.