Literature DB >> 19142792

Implementing safer alternatives to lithographic cleanup solvents to protect the health of workers and the environment.

Patrice Sutton1, Katy Wolf, Julia Quint.   

Abstract

The use of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in lithographic printing cleanup is an environmental and occupational hazard. Regulations to reduce ambient ozone levels limited VOC emissions from lithographic cleanup operations and spurred the development of low-VOC alternatives. The purpose of this project was to promote the substitution of hazardous cleanup solvents with less toxic chemicals to protect the health of workers and the environment. A convenience sample of printers, employers, union, industry, and government representatives was constructed. Data regarding the lithographic printing work force and the use of cleanup solvents and alternatives were collected through: (1) work site walk-throughs, (2) a focus group, (3) key informant interviews, (4) a half-day workshop, and (5) demonstration projects. Overall, 66 individuals from 15 different print shops, 10 government agencies, the lithographic printing industry, and one printer's union participated in one or more aspects of the project. Printer inhalation exposure to hazardous cleanup solvents was prevalent and printers were not aware of safer alternatives. Employers should implement low-VOC, low-toxicity cleanup products in a timely manner to protect the health of printers and the environment. Use of low-VOC lithographic cleanup products does not mitigate the potential for printer dermal exposure and may carry safety and ergonomic implications. Lithographic cleanup solvent manufacturers should seek low-VOC ingredients that do not pose a dermal exposure hazard. Linking environmental and occupational health prevented the development of substitutes that would have introduced worker hazards and provided an opportunity to circumvent some of the inadequacies of the current occupational health regulatory apparatus. Governmental organizations should establish and maintain institutional interdisciplinary mechanisms to support these linkages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19142792     DOI: 10.1080/15459620802705524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  3 in total

1.  The Boston Safe Shops model: an integrated approach to community environmental and occupational health.

Authors:  Cora Roelofs; Paul Shoemaker; Tiffany Skogstrom; Persio Acevedo; Jumaane Kendrick; Nancie Nguyen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Results of a community-university partnership to reduce deadly hazards in hardwood floor finishing.

Authors:  Lenore S Azaroff; Hoa Mai Nguyen; Tuan Do; Rebecca Gore; Marcy Goldstein-Gelb
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-08

3.  Do insulation products of man-made vitreous fibres still cause skin discomfort?

Authors:  Lennart Lundgren; Cecilia Moberg; Carola Lidén
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 6.600

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.