Literature DB >> 19141148

Improvement of reading speed after providing of low vision aids in patients with age-related macular degeneration.

Nhung Xuan Nguyen1, Malte Weismann, Susanne Trauzettel-Klosinski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of severe visual impairment, including loss of reading ability, among elderly persons in developed countries. The aim of the present study was to evaluate reading ability before and after providing of appropriate low vision aids.
METHODS: Five hundred and thirty patients with different stages of AMD (age 82 +/- 8 years) were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent a standardized ophthalmological examination including evaluation of magnification requirement and careful providing of low vision aids. Before and after the provision of low vision aids, reading speed [words per minute (wpm)] was evaluated using standardized reading texts.
RESULTS: For the whole group, the average best-corrected distance visual acuity of the better eye was 0.18 +/- 0.15, with 69% of patients having visual acuity of 0.1 (20/200) or better. The mean magnification requirement was 7.4 +/- 6.3-fold (range 2-25). Visual rehabilitation was achieved with optical visual aids in 58% of patients, whereas 42% of patients needed electronically closed-circuit TV systems. Mean reading speed was 20 +/- 33 wpm before and increased significantly to 72 +/- 35 (p < 0.0001) after the provision of low vision aids for the whole group. Between patients with visual acuity < 0.1 and patients with visual acuity of 0.1 or better, there are highly significant differences in reading speed before (0.4 +/- 3.8 versus 20 +/- 28 wpm, p <or= 0.0001) and after providing of visual aids (40 +/- 13 versus 84 +/- 30 wpm, p <or= 0.0001). Patients with severe visual impairment (visual acuity <or= 0.1) showed significantly lower improvement of reading speed compared to patients with visual acuity of 0.1 or better following rehabilitation (p <or= 0.0001). Before providing of low vision aids, only 16% of patients were able to read; in contrast, reading ability was achieved in 94% of patients after the provision of low vision aids for the whole group.
CONCLUSION: Our results indicate the great value of low vision rehabilitation through adequate providing of vision aids for the improvement of reading ability, with a highly significant increase of reading speed without training of eccentric viewing in patients with retained central fixation. The prompt implementation of low vision aids in patients with macular degeneration will help them to maintain and regain their reading ability, which can lead to an increase in independence, communication, mental agility and quality of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19141148     DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2008.01423.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


  23 in total

Review 1.  High Tech Aids Low Vision: A Review of Image Processing for the Visually Impaired.

Authors:  Howard Moshtael; Tariq Aslam; Ian Underwood; Baljean Dhillon
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.283

2.  [Requirements for low vision magnification aids in age-related macular degeneration: Data from the Tübingen low vision clinic (comparison of 2007-2011 with 1999-2005)].

Authors:  E K Altpeter; N X Nguyen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Assessment of the Apple iPad as a low-vision reading aid.

Authors:  E Morrice; A P Johnson; J-A Marinier; W Wittich
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Comparison of LogMAR Eye charts with angular vision for visually impaired: the Berkeley rudimentary vision test vs LogMAR One target Landolt ring Eye chart.

Authors:  Marie Miwa; Masaki Iwanami; Mari S Oba; Nobuhisa Mizuki; Tomomi Nishida
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Beneficial Effects of Spatial Remapping for Reading With Simulated Central Field Loss.

Authors:  Anshul Gupta; Juraj Mesik; Stephen A Engel; Rebecca Smith; Mark Schatza; Aurélie Calabrèse; Frederik J van Kuijk; Arthur G Erdman; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Adding access to a video magnifier to standard vision rehabilitation: initial results on reading performance and well-being from a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Mary Lou Jackson; Kimberly A Schoessow; Alexandra Selivanova; Jennifer Wallis
Journal:  Digit J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-03-31

7.  Baseline traits of low vision patients served by private outpatient clinical centers in the United States.

Authors:  Judith E Goldstein; Robert W Massof; James T Deremeik; Sonya Braudway; Mary Lou Jackson; K Bradley Kehler; Susan A Primo; Janet S Sunness
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-08

8.  [The influence of visual rehabilitation on secondary depressive disorders due to age-related macular degeneration. A randomized controlled pilot study].

Authors:  A Mielke; K Wirkus; R Niebler; G Eschweiler; N X Nguyen; S Trauzettel-Klosinski
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Digital reader vs print media: the role of digital technology in reading accuracy in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  K Gill; A Mao; A M Powell; T Sheidow
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Visual function assessment in simulated real-life situations in patients with age-related macular degeneration compared to normal subjects.

Authors:  G Barteselli; M L Gomez; A L Doede; J Chhablani; W Gutstein; D-U Bartsch; L Dustin; S P Azen; W R Freeman
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.