Literature DB >> 19140908

Atrial fibrillation therapy in patients with a CRT defibrillator with wireless telemetry.

George H Crossley1, Kazutaka Aonuma, Charles Haffajee, Morio Shoda, Albert Meijer, Alexander Bauer, Giuseppe Boriani, Jesper Svendsen, Shelley Thomas, Christopher Wiggenhorn, Christina Unterberg-Buchwald.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in patients with congestive heart failure.
OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this international, prospective multicenter study were to evaluate the efficacy of atrial shock therapy in patients with a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) and to evaluate the safety of the new CRT-D. The effectiveness of a new wireless telemetry system was also evaluated.
METHODS: A total of 282 patients, without permanent AF, who had indications for a CRT-D were included. Atrial shock therapy was tested on both spontaneous and induced AF episodes. The effectiveness of the Medtronic wireless telemetry system (Conexus; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) was also tested. Secondary endpoints included the heart failure Clinical Composite Response, system performance evaluation, and adverse event summary.
RESULTS: Atrial shock therapy was successful in 168 of 171 episodes (98.2%). Of these, 138 episodes were induced and 33 were spontaneous. Successful cardioversion occurred in 137 of the 138 induced-AF episodes (86.1% with 12 joule (J), 13.1% with 24 J, and 0.7% with 35 J). During the first 3 months of implant, there were 43 system-related complications in 37 subjects out of 278 subjects. There were 1,999 Conexus telemetry uses recorded during this study. This includes 282 uses during the implant procedure. There were no cases of complete loss of telemetry or any adverse events reported using this system.
CONCLUSION: We achieved an atrial shock efficacy of 98.2% in patients who met standard CRT-D indications. The wireless telemetry performed well with no reported unanticipated adverse device effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19140908     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02171.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  3 in total

Review 1.  Is An Atrial Defibrillator Still An Option In Treating Patients With Atrial Fibrillation?

Authors:  Ziad El Khoury; Deepak Bhakta
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2013-02-12

2.  Early performance of a miniaturized leadless cardiac pacemaker: the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study.

Authors:  Philippe Ritter; Gabor Z Duray; Clemens Steinwender; Kyoko Soejima; Razali Omar; Lluís Mont; Lucas V A Boersma; Reinoud E Knops; Larry Chinitz; Shu Zhang; Calambur Narasimhan; John Hummel; Michael Lloyd; Timothy Alexander Simmers; Andrew Voigt; Verla Laager; Kurt Stromberg; Matthew D Bonner; Todd J Sheldon; Dwight Reynolds
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Low efficacy of cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation with the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Authors:  I Limantoro; K Vernooy; B Weijs; R Pisters; L Debie; H J Crijns; Y Blaauw
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.380

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.