Literature DB >> 1914055

Epidural nalbuphine for analgesia following caesarean delivery: dose-response and effect of local anaesthetic choice.

W R Camann1, R H Hurley, L I Gilbertson, M L Long, S Datta.   

Abstract

The analgesic profile of epidural nalbuphine for postoperative pain relief and the impact of local anaesthetic choice upon this profile was investigated in 58 patients undergoing elective Caesarean delivery under epidural anaesthesia. Patients were randomized to receive either lidocaine 2% with 1:200,000 epinephrine or 2-chloroprocaine 3% for perioperative anaesthesia, followed by either 10, 20, or 30 mg of epidural nalbuphine administered at the first complaint of postoperative discomfort. Postoperative analgesia was quantitated on a visual analogue (VAS) scale, and by the time from the epidural opioid injection until the first request for supplemental pain medication. The duration of analgesia after lidocaine anaesthesia followed by 10, 20 or 30 mg nalbuphine was 77 (53-127) min, 205 (110-269) min, and 185 (116-241), respectively (median, 95% confidence interval, P less than 0.01, 20 and 30 mg vs 10 mg). Following 2-chloroprocaine anaesthesia, VAS remained consistently elevated: the median duration of analgesia was only 30-40 min and did not differ among the three doses of nalbuphine. Side-effects consisted only of somnolence, and were noted only following lidocaine anaesthesia. Somnolence was observed in 0, 20% and 50% of those receiving 10 mg, 20 mg and 30 mg of nalbuphine respectively (NS). No evidence of respiratory depression was noted in any patient. It is concluded that 20 or 30 mg of epidural nalbuphine provides analgesia for only two to four hours following Caesarean delivery with lidocaine anaesthesia, but anaesthesia with 2-chloroprocaine resulted in minimal or no analgesia from this opioid. Nalbuphine appears to be a disappointing agent for epidural use after Caesarean delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1914055     DOI: 10.1007/BF03008450

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  6 in total

1.  Epidural hydromorphone with and without epinephrine for post-operative analgesia after cesarean delivery.

Authors:  T B Dougherty; C L Baysinger; J C Henenberger; D J Gooding
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Chloroprocaine antagonism of epidural opioid analgesia: a receptor-specific phenomenon?

Authors:  W R Camann; P M Hartigan; L I Gilbertson; M D Johnson; S Datta
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  A dose-response study of nalbuphine for post-thoracotomy epidural analgesia.

Authors:  A D Baxter; S Langanière; B Samson; I J McGilveray; K Hull
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.063

4.  Preliminary study of epidural nalbuphine in treatment of post operative pain: a comparison with equipotent dose of epidural morphine.

Authors:  N Weksler; L Ovadia
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1989-03-01       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Labor analgesia with epidural bupivacaine plus fentanyl: enhancement with epinephrine and inhibition with 2-chloroprocaine.

Authors:  S C Grice; J C Eisenach; D M Dewan
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  The analgetic effects of an intrathecally administered partial opiate agonist, nalbuphine hydrochloride.

Authors:  C Schmauss; C Doherty; T L Yaksh
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1982-12-17       Impact factor: 4.432

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Randomized Controlled Trial for Evaluating the Analgesic Effect of Nalbuphine as an Adjuvant to Bupivacaine in Supraclavicular Block under Ultrasound Guidance.

Authors:  Nazia Nazir; Shruti Jain
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.