Literature DB >> 1914054

Continuous opioid infusions for neurosurgical procedures: a double-blind comparison of alfentanil and fentanyl.

W A Mutch1, K R Ringaert, F J Ewert, I W White, N Donen, R J Hudson.   

Abstract

The ability of continuous infusions of opioids to control hypertension at the end of neurosurgical procedures without compromising prompt emergence was studied in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial tumours. Four infusion regimens were compared in a randomized double-blind fashion; three of alfentanil and one of fentanyl. Low-dose alfentanil was administered to nine patients (35.1 micrograms.kg-1 then a continuous infusion of 16.2 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1); mid-dose alfentanil to eight patients (70.2 micrograms.kg-1 then 32.4 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1); high-dose alfentanil to eight patients (105.3 micrograms.kg-1 then 48.6 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1). Eight additional patients were given fentanyl (8.3 micrograms.kg-1 then 1.6 micrograms.kg-1.hr-1). Using published values for the pharmacokinetic variables of alfentanil and fentanyl, modelling predicted stable concentrations of 60, 120, 180 ng.ml-1 for the alfentanil infusion regimens respectively and 2 ng.ml-1 with the fentanyl regimen. Maintenance anaesthesia comprised the opioid infusion, 50% N2O in O2 and isoflurane titrated to control mean arterial pressure (MAP) within 20% of ward MAP. Isoflurane was discontinued after closure of the dura. Nitrous oxide was discontinued at the same time as reversal of neuromuscular blockade. The opioid infusion was discontinued with closure of the galea. A greater time-averaged isoflurane concentration was required to control MAP within the prescribed limits in the low alfentanil group (ANOVA; P less than 0.05). The PaCO2 at two, five and 30 min after extubation were not different among groups. The times from discontinuing N2O to eye opening and tracheal extubation were not different. The time to follow commands was longer in the low alfentanil group (P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1914054     DOI: 10.1007/bf03008447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


  11 in total

1.  Alfentanil--a kinetically predictable narcotic analgesic.

Authors:  D R Stanski; C C Hug
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  The pharmacokinetics of alfentanil (R39209): a new opioid analgesic.

Authors:  J G Bovill; P S Sebel; C L Blackburn; J Heykants
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Fentanyl infusion anesthesia for aortocoronary bypass surgery: plasma levels and hemodynamic response.

Authors:  J S Sprigge; J E Wynands; D G Whalley; D R Bevan; G E Townsend; H Nathan; Y C Patel; C B Srikant
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 5.108

4.  Comparison of a computer-assisted infusion versus intermittent bolus administration of alfentanil as a supplement to nitrous oxide for lower abdominal surgery.

Authors:  M E Ausems; J Vuyk; C C Hug; D R Stanski
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  The anesthetic potency of fentanyl in terms of its reduction of enflurane MAC.

Authors:  M R Murphy; C C Hug
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Comparison between high-dose sufentanil-oxygen and high-dose fentanyl-oxygen for neuroanaesthesia.

Authors:  R C Shupak; J R Harp
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 9.166

7.  Intravenous fentanyl kinetics.

Authors:  D A McClain; C C Hug
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery.

Authors:  R J Hudson; I R Thomson; J E Cannon; R M Friesen; R C Meatherall
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  EEG quantitation of narcotic effect: the comparative pharmacodynamics of fentanyl and alfentanil.

Authors:  J C Scott; K V Ponganis; D R Stanski
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Labetalol and esmolol in the control of hypertension after intracranial surgery.

Authors:  D A Muzzi; S Black; T J Losasso; R F Cucchiara
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.108

View more
  2 in total

1.  Gender rather than choice of intermediate duration opioids affects emergence after craniotomy for large intracranial tumors.

Authors:  Anupa Deogaonkar; Mimi Khin; Samuel Samuel; Zeyd Y Ebrahim; Edward J Mascha; Armin Schubert
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2011

2.  Haemodynamic instability and myocardial ischaemia during carotid endarterectomy: a comparison of propofol and isoflurane.

Authors:  W A Mutch; I W White; N Donen; I R Thomson; M Rosenbloom; M Cheang; M West
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.063

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.