BACKGROUND: Perivascular adipose tissue may be associated with the amount of local atherosclerosis. We developed a novel and reproducible method to standardize volumetric quantification of periaortic adipose tissue by computed tomography (CT) and determined the association with anthropometric measures of obesity, and abdominal adipose tissue. METHODS: Measurements of adipose tissue were performed in a random subset of participants from the Framingham Heart Study (n=100) who underwent multidetector CT of the thorax (ECG triggering, 2.5 mm slice thickness) and the abdomen (helical CT acquisition, 2.5 mm slice thickness). Abdominal periaortic adipose tissue (AAT) was defined by a 5 mm cylindrical region of interest around the aortic wall; thoracic periaortic adipose tissue (TAT) was defined by anatomic landmarks. TAT and AAT were defined as any voxel between -195 and -45 HU and volumes were measured using dedicated semiautomatic software. Measurement reproducibility and association with anthropometric measures of obesity, and abdominal adipose tissue were determined. RESULTS: The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility for both AAT and TAT was excellent (ICC: 0.97 and 0.97; 0.99 and 0.98, respectively). Similarly, the relative intra- and inter-observer difference was small for both AAT (-1.85+/-1.28% and 7.85+/-6.08%; respectively) and TAT (3.56+/-0.83% and -4.56+/-0.85%, respectively). Both AAT and TAT were highly correlated with visceral abdominal fat (r=0.65 and 0.77, P<0.0001 for both) and moderately correlated with subcutaneous abdominal fat (r=0.39 and 0.42, P<0.0001 and P=0.009), waist circumference (r=0.49 and 0.57, P<0.0001 for both) and body mass index (r=0.47 and 0.58, P<0.0001 for both). CONCLUSION: Standardized semiautomatic CT-based volumetric quantification of periaortic adipose tissue is feasible and highly reproducible. Further investigation is warranted regarding associations of periaortic adipose tissue with other body fat deposits, cardiovascular risk factors and clinical outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Perivascular adipose tissue may be associated with the amount of local atherosclerosis. We developed a novel and reproducible method to standardize volumetric quantification of periaortic adipose tissue by computed tomography (CT) and determined the association with anthropometric measures of obesity, and abdominal adipose tissue. METHODS: Measurements of adipose tissue were performed in a random subset of participants from the Framingham Heart Study (n=100) who underwent multidetector CT of the thorax (ECG triggering, 2.5 mm slice thickness) and the abdomen (helical CT acquisition, 2.5 mm slice thickness). Abdominal periaortic adipose tissue (AAT) was defined by a 5 mm cylindrical region of interest around the aortic wall; thoracic periaortic adipose tissue (TAT) was defined by anatomic landmarks. TAT and AAT were defined as any voxel between -195 and -45 HU and volumes were measured using dedicated semiautomatic software. Measurement reproducibility and association with anthropometric measures of obesity, and abdominal adipose tissue were determined. RESULTS: The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility for both AAT and TAT was excellent (ICC: 0.97 and 0.97; 0.99 and 0.98, respectively). Similarly, the relative intra- and inter-observer difference was small for both AAT (-1.85+/-1.28% and 7.85+/-6.08%; respectively) and TAT (3.56+/-0.83% and -4.56+/-0.85%, respectively). Both AAT and TAT were highly correlated with visceral abdominal fat (r=0.65 and 0.77, P<0.0001 for both) and moderately correlated with subcutaneous abdominal fat (r=0.39 and 0.42, P<0.0001 and P=0.009), waist circumference (r=0.49 and 0.57, P<0.0001 for both) and body mass index (r=0.47 and 0.58, P<0.0001 for both). CONCLUSION: Standardized semiautomatic CT-based volumetric quantification of periaortic adipose tissue is feasible and highly reproducible. Further investigation is warranted regarding associations of periaortic adipose tissue with other body fat deposits, cardiovascular risk factors and clinical outcomes.
Authors: E Okamoto; T Couse; H De Leon; J Vinten-Johansen; R B Goodman; N A Scott; J N Wilcox Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-10-30 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Tomasz Mazurek; LiFeng Zhang; Andrew Zalewski; John D Mannion; James T Diehl; Hwyda Arafat; Lea Sarov-Blat; Shawn O'Brien; Elizabeth A Keiper; Anthony G Johnson; Jack Martin; Barry J Goldstein; Yi Shi Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-10-27 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Satish Kenchaiah; Jane C Evans; Daniel Levy; Peter W F Wilson; Emelia J Benjamin; Martin G Larson; William B Kannel; Ramachandran S Vasan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-08-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Meredith C Foster; Shih-Jen Hwang; Stacy A Porter; Joseph M Massaro; Udo Hoffmann; Caroline S Fox Journal: Hypertension Date: 2011-09-19 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: Jane J Lee; Alison Pedley; Ido Weinberg; Kathryn A Britton; Joseph M Massaro; Udo Hoffmann; Emily Manders; Caroline S Fox; Joanne M Murabito Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: K Turkmen; H Z Tonbul; F M Erdur; I Guney; H Kayikcioglu; L Altintepe; O Ozbek; M I Yilmaz; A Gaipov; S Turk; A Covic; M Kanbay Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2012-09-23 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Frederick L Ruberg; Zhongjing Chen; Ning Hua; Sherman Bigornia; Zifang Guo; Kevin Hallock; Hernan Jara; Michael LaValley; Alkystis Phinikaridou; Ye Qiao; Jason Viereck; Caroline M Apovian; James A Hamilton Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 5.002