Literature DB >> 19139062

Spontaneous baroreflex measures are unable to detect age-related impairments in cardiac baroreflex function during dynamic exercise in humans.

James P Fisher1, Shigehiko Ogoh, Chelif Junor, Azamuddin Khaja, Mindy Northrup, Paul J Fadel.   

Abstract

The dynamic relationship between 'spontaneous' fluctuations in arterial blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) is increasingly being used to provide an estimate of resting cardiac baroreflex sensitivity. Given the ease of use and clinical utility, spontaneous methods are now also being used to examine cardiac baroreflex sensitivity in distinct subject groups during various laboratory stressors and tasks encountered during daily life, such as physical activity. However, the utility of such spontaneous measures to estimate cardiac baroreflex function during exercise remains unclear, particularly when comparing groups. Therefore, we tested the ability of spontaneous indices to detect age-related differences in cardiac baroreflex function during dynamic exercise. Beat-to-beat HR and BP were measured in eighteen healthy young subjects (24 +/- 1 years) and sixteen healthy middle-aged subjects (59 +/- 1 years) at rest and during steady-state leg cycling. Estimates of spontaneous cardiac baroreflex sensitivity using the sequence technique (G(SEQ)) and low-frequency transfer function gain (G(TF)) were compared with the operating point (G(OP)) and maximal gain (G(MAX)) of the full carotid-cardiac baroreflex function curve. At rest G(SEQ), G(TF), G(OP) and G(MAX) were all significantly lower in older subjects. During moderate-intensity steady-state exercise no differences were observed in G(SEQ) and G(TF) (older 0.26 +/- 0.03 beats min(-1) mmHg(-1) versus younger 0.32 +/- 0.04 beats min(-1) mmHg(-1); P > 0.05), whereas G(OP) and G(MAX) (older -0.21 +/- 0.02 beats min(-1) mmHg(-1) versus younger -0.39 +/- 0.03 beats min(-1) mmHg(-1); P < 0.05) remained lower in older subjects. These data indicate that spontaneous measures of cardiac baroreflex sensitivity alone provide limited information when comparing age-groups during exercise, which makes genuine differences in baroreflex function difficult to identify.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19139062      PMCID: PMC2858404          DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2008.044867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Physiol        ISSN: 0958-0670            Impact factor:   2.969


  55 in total

Review 1.  Baroreflex sensitivity: measurement and clinical implications.

Authors:  Maria Teresa La Rovere; Gian Domenico Pinna; Grzegorz Raczak
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 2.  Heart rate control during exercise by baroreceptors and skeletal muscle afferents.

Authors:  D S O'Leary
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Baroreflex sensitivity and heart-rate variability in prediction of total cardiac mortality after myocardial infarction. ATRAMI (Autonomic Tone and Reflexes After Myocardial Infarction) Investigators.

Authors:  M T La Rovere; J T Bigger; F I Marcus; A Mortara; P J Schwartz
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Age-associated changes in cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity are related to central arterial compliance.

Authors:  K D Monahan; F A Dinenno; D R Seals; C M Clevenger; C A Desouza; H Tanaka
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.733

5.  Does reduced vascular stiffening fully explain preserved cardiovagal baroreflex function in older, physically active men?

Authors:  B E Hunt; W B Farquhar; J A Taylor
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-05-22       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 6.  How to measure baroreflex sensitivity: from the cardiovascular laboratory to daily life.

Authors:  G Parati; M Di Rienzo; G Mancia
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.844

7.  Cardiac muscarinic receptors decrease with age. In vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  O E Brodde; U Konschak; K Becker; F Rüter; U Poller; J Jakubetz; J Radke; H R Zerkowski
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1998-01-15       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Baroreflex control of sinus node during dynamic exercise in humans: effects of central command and muscle reflexes.

Authors:  F Iellamo; J M Legramante; G Raimondi; G Peruzzi
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1997-03

9.  Arterial baroreflex modulation of heart rate in chronic heart failure: clinical and hemodynamic correlates and prognostic implications.

Authors:  A Mortara; M T La Rovere; G D Pinna; A Prpa; R Maestri; O Febo; M Pozzoli; C Opasich; L Tavazzi
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-11-18       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Carotid baroreflex regulation of sympathetic nerve activity during dynamic exercise in humans.

Authors:  P J Fadel; S Ogoh; D E Watenpaugh; W Wasmund; A Olivencia-Yurvati; M L Smith; P B Raven
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.733

View more
  13 in total

1.  Effect of muscle metaboreflex activation on spontaneous cardiac baroreflex sensitivity during exercise in humans.

Authors:  Doreen Hartwich; William E Dear; Jessica L Waterfall; James P Fisher
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  Human investigations into the arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreflexes during exercise.

Authors:  Paul J Fadel; Peter B Raven
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 2.969

3.  Influence of ageing on carotid baroreflex peak response latency in humans.

Authors:  James P Fisher; Areum Kim; Colin N Young; Shigehiko Ogoh; Peter B Raven; Niels H Secher; Paul J Fadel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Spontaneous fluctuation indices of the cardiovagal baroreflex accurately measure the baroreflex sensitivity at the operating point during upright tilt.

Authors:  Christopher E Schwartz; Marvin S Medow; Zachary Messer; Julian M Stewart
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Autonomic control of heart rate by metabolically sensitive skeletal muscle afferents in humans.

Authors:  James P Fisher; Thomas Seifert; Doreen Hartwich; Colin N Young; Niels H Secher; Paul J Fadel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-02-08       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Autonomic control of the heart is altered in Sprague-Dawley rats with spontaneous hydronephrosis.

Authors:  Amy C Arnold; Hossam A Shaltout; Shea Gilliam-Davis; Nancy D Kock; Debra I Diz
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  Leptin impairs cardiovagal baroreflex function at the level of the solitary tract nucleus.

Authors:  Amy C Arnold; Hossam A Shaltout; Patricia E Gallagher; Debra I Diz
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 10.190

8.  A beat-by-beat analysis of cardiovascular responses to dry resting and exercise apnoeas in elite divers.

Authors:  Andrea Sivieri; Nazzareno Fagoni; Aurélien Bringard; Michela Capogrosso; Renza Perini; Guido Ferretti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 9.  Cardiac Autonomic Responses during Exercise and Post-exercise Recovery Using Heart Rate Variability and Systolic Time Intervals-A Review.

Authors:  Scott Michael; Kenneth S Graham; Glen M Davis
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Acute and chronic systemic CB1 cannabinoid receptor blockade improves blood pressure regulation and metabolic profile in hypertensive (mRen2)27 rats.

Authors:  Chris L Schaich; Hossam A Shaltout; K Bridget Brosnihan; Allyn C Howlett; Debra I Diz
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2014-08-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.