Literature DB >> 19138634

Evaluation of sinus bone resorption and marginal bone loss after sinus bone grafting and implant placement.

Young-Kyun Kim1, Pil-Young Yun, Su-Gwan Kim, Bum-Soo Kim, Joo L Ong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the sinus bone graft resorption and marginal bone loss around the implants when allograft and xenograft are used. STUDY
DESIGN: Sinus bone grafting and implant placement (Osstem, Korea) were performed on 28 patients from September 2003 to January 2006. In group I, a total of 49 implants were placed in 23 maxillary sinus areas of 16 patients together with bone graft using xenograft (Bio-Oss) and a minimal amount of autogenous bone. In group II, 24 implants were placed in 13 maxillary sinus areas of 12 patients together with bone graft using a minimal amount of autogenous bone and equal amounts of allograft (Regenaform) and Bio-Oss in group II.
RESULTS: Early osseointegration failures of 3 implants in 3 patients (group I: 1 patient, 1 implant; group II: 2 patients, 2 implants) were observed, and revisions were performed for these 3 implant sites, followed by complete prosthodontic treatments. The average height of the remaining alveolar bone before the surgery, immediately after the surgery, and 1 year after the surgery was 4.9 mm, 19.0 mm, and 17.2 mm, respectively, in group I. In group II, the average height of the remaining alveolar bone was 4.0 mm, 19.2 mm, and 17.8 mm before the surgery, immediately after the surgery, and 1 year after the surgery, respectively. The average marginal bone loss 1 year after prosthodontic loading and after 20.8 months' follow-up was 0.6 mm and 0.7 mm, respectively, in group I. A 93.9% success rate was observed for group I, with 3 implants showing bone resorption of >1.5 mm within 1 year of loading. For group II, the average marginal bone loss 1 year after prosthodontic loading and after 19.7 months' follow-up was 0.7 mm and 1.0 mm, respectively. An 83.3% success rate was observed for group II, with 4 implants showing bone resorption of >1.5 mm within 1 year of loading.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the observations in this study, it was concluded that mixed grafting with demineralized bone matrix for maxillary sinus bone grafting has no significant short-term merit regarding bone healing and stability of implants compared with anorganic bovine bone alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19138634     DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.09.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  10 in total

1.  Assessment of the autogenous bone graft for sinus elevation.

Authors:  Wang Peng; Il-Kyu Kim; Hyun-Young Cho; Sang-Pill Pae; Bum-Sang Jung; Hyun-Woo Cho; Ji-Hoon Seo
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-12-23

2.  Resorption of bone graft after maxillary sinus grafting and simultaneous implant placement.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Kim; Su-Gwan Kim; Bum-Su Kim; Kyung-In Jeong
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-06-27

3.  Comparison of autogenous tooth bone graft and synthetic bone graft materials used for bone resorption around implants after crestal approach sinus lifting: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Kim; Junho Lee; Ji-Young Yun; Pil-Young Yun; In-Woong Um
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 2.614

4.  Risk Factors for Wound Dehiscence after Guided Bone Regeneration in Dental Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Young-Kyun Kim; Pil-Young Yun
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014-05-30

5.  High-Resolution Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis of the Clinical Efficacy of Cultured Autogenous Periosteal Cells in Sinus Lift Bone Grafting.

Authors:  Shin Ogawa; Hideyuki Hoshina; Koh Nakata; Kazuho Yamada; Kohya Uematsu; Tomoyuki Kawase; Ritsuo Takagi; Masaki Nagata
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.932

6.  Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using a Titanium Mesh: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Khalid Bahaa-Eldin; Basma Mostafa; Sherine Nasry; Ahmed Reda; Mona Shoeib
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-12

Review 7.  Sandblasted and Acid Etched Titanium Dental Implant Surfaces Systematic Review and Confocal Microscopy Evaluation.

Authors:  Gabriele Cervino; Luca Fiorillo; Gaetano Iannello; Dario Santonocito; Giacomo Risitano; Marco Cicciù
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 8.  Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with Autogenous Bone Graft Compared with a Composite Grafting Material or Bone Substitute Alone: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing Volumetric Stability of the Grafting Material.

Authors:  Thomas Starch-Jensen; Daniel Deluiz; Julie Vitenson; Niels Henrik Bruun; Eduardo Muniz Barretto Tinoco
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2021-03-31

9.  Clinical and radiographic outcomes of dental implant after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with rhBMP-2/hydroxyapatite compared to deproteinized bovine bone.

Authors:  Jeong Joon Han; Ji Eun Moon; Eun-Hyuk Lee; Hoon Joo Yang; Soon Jung Hwang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.752

10.  Application of low-crystalline carbonate apatite granules in 2-stage sinus floor augmentation: a prospective clinical trial and histomorphometric evaluation.

Authors:  Takayuki Nakagawa; Keiko Kudoh; Naoyuki Fukuda; Shohei Kasugai; Noriko Tachikawa; Kiyoshi Koyano; Yasuyuki Matsushita; Masanori Sasaki; Kunio Ishikawa; Youji Miyamoto
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.614

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.