Literature DB >> 19138375

Associations among physiological and subjective sexual response, sexual desire, and salivary steroid hormones in healthy premenopausal women.

Sari M van Anders1, Lori Brotto, Janine Farrell, Morag Yule.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have examined how sexual arousal influences healthy premenopausal women's hormones, limiting our understanding of basic physiology and our ability to transfer knowledge from clinical and nonhuman populations. AIM: To examine how sexual arousal and steroid hormones (testosterone [T], cortisol [C], estradiol [E]) were linked, to see whether hormone levels influenced and/or changed in response to sexual arousal elicited via visual erotic stimuli in healthy women.
METHODS: Participants included 40 healthy premenopausal women not using exogenous hormones. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in genital sexual arousal (vaginal pulse amplitude), change in subjective sexual arousal, sexual desire (via the Sexual Desire Inventory and Female Sexual Function Index scales), as well as T, C, and E via saliva samples taken before and following viewing of erotic stimuli as genital arousal was recorded via a vaginal photoplethysmograph.
RESULTS: E increased in response to sexual stimuli but this was not statistically associated with genital sexual arousal, whereas C decreased in association with genital sexual arousal, and T showed no statistically significant change. Relationship status was linked to genital but not subjective sexual arousal such that dating women exhibited higher genital sexual arousal than single or partnered women. Results indicated that all three hormones were associated with self-reported genital arousal (via the Detailed Assessment of Sexual Arousal scales) and sexual desire in different domains, and both T and E were associated with self-reported orgasms.
CONCLUSION: Findings point to the need to examine multiple hormones in multiple ways (e.g., baseline, changes, stimulated) and question using erotic stimuli-induced arousal as a model for women's endocrine responses to sexuality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19138375     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01123.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  6 in total

1.  Fulfilling desire: evidence for negative feedback between men's testosterone, sociosexual psychology, and sexual partner number.

Authors:  David A Puts; Lauramarie E Pope; Alexander K Hill; Rodrigo A Cárdenas; Lisa L M Welling; John R Wheatley; S Marc Breedlove
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.587

2.  Adult attachment and testosterone reactivity: Fathers' avoidance predicts changes in testosterone during the strange situation procedure.

Authors:  Robin S Edelstein; Kristi Chin; Ekjyot K Saini; Patty X Kuo; Oliver C Schultheiss; Brenda L Volling
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 3.587

3.  Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between sympathetic nervous system activation and women's physiological sexual arousal.

Authors:  Tierney Ahrold Lorenz; Christopher B Harte; Lisa Dawn Hamilton; Cindy M Meston
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Physiological stress responses predict sexual functioning and satisfaction differently in women who have and have not been sexually abused in childhood.

Authors:  Cindy M Meston; Tierney A Lorenz
Journal:  Psychol Trauma       Date:  2013-07-01

5.  Interactions between inflammation and female sexual desire and arousal function.

Authors:  Tierney K Lorenz
Journal:  Curr Sex Health Rep       Date:  2019-10-28

6.  Waist-to-Hip Ratio, but Not Body Mass Index, Is Associated with Testosterone and Estradiol Concentrations in Young Women.

Authors:  Ricardo Mondragón-Ceballos; Mónica Dafne García Granados; Ana Lilia Cerda-Molina; Roberto Chavira-Ramírez; Leonor Estela Hernández-López
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.257

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.