Literature DB >> 19138357

Sexual function and tunica albuginea wound healing following penile fracture: An 18-year follow-up study of 352 patients from Kermanshah, Iran.

Javaad Zargooshi1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We present a study on the experiences of penile fracture in an Iranian population. Aim. To determine the long-term outcome of penile fracture.
METHODS: Between April 1990 and May 2008, 373 patients presented with clinical features suggestive of penile fracture. Of these, 11 declined surgery. The remaining 362 were operated upon using a degloving incision. Ten patients had venous injury and 352 had penile fracture. At follow-up visits, in addition to answering our questionnaire, the patients completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), Erection Hardness Grading Scale (EHGS), and global self-assessment of potency (GSAP). To enhance documentation and to promote transparency, with the patients' permission, their full name and hospital chart number was sent to the journal. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical findings and IIEF and EHGS scores.
RESULTS: Mean patients' age was 29.6 years. Mean duration of follow-up was 93.6 months. Diagnosis was solely clinical. At presentation, 278 (78.9%) reported no pain. Cavernosography, ultrasonography, or magnetic resonance imaging was not used in any of the patients. Penile fracture was due to taqaandan in 269 patients (76.4%). Patients were treated with surgical exploration and repair within 24 hours of admission, regardless of delay in presentation. A nodule was found at follow-up in 330 patients (93.7%). The painless, mostly proximal nodule was palpated at the floor of the corpora cavernosa, in a deep midline position above the corpus spongiosum. The non-expansive nodule was not associated with erectile dysfunction (ED) or Peyronie's disease. Postoperative complications included mild penile pain in cold weather (two patients), transient wound edema (one patient), mild chordee (four patients), and occasional instability of the erect penis (one patient). Postoperatively, of the 217 patients who had partners, 214 (98.6%) were potent. Mean IIEF ED domain score was 29.8 +/- 1.1. The EHGS score was 4 in 203 and 3 in 11. The GSAP score was 0 in 204, 1 in 8, and 2 in 2. ED in the remaining three could not be explained by penile fracture. Of 10 nonoperated patients, eight (80%) developed ED.
CONCLUSION: Pain is rare in penile fracture. Postoperatively, almost all patients develop a permanent, inconsequential, fibrotic nodule. Our time-tested approach provided excellent long-term sexual function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19138357     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.01117.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  23 in total

1.  Fracture penis - Is it really an uncommon entity?

Authors:  Bharath N Kumar; Anil V Akulwar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2014-06-07

2.  Penile fracture with bilateral corporeal rupture without urethral involvement.

Authors:  Tarik Yonguc; Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Bumin Ors; Zafer Kozacioglu; Burak Arslan; Nilufer Goksin Yonguc
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Management of penile fracture.

Authors:  Jesse Ory; Greg Bailly
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Can it wait? A systematic review of immediate vs. delayed surgical repair of penile fractures.

Authors:  Nathan Colin Wong; Shawn Dason; Rahul K Bansal; Timothy O Davies; Luis H Braga
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Older age and a large tunical tear may be predictors of increased erectile dysfunction rates following penile fracture surgery.

Authors:  Mazhar Ortac; Faruk Özgor; Ufuk Caglar; Abdullah Esmeray; Metin Savun; Ömer Sarılar
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.896

6.  Effects of penile fracture and its surgical treatment on psychosocial and sexual function.

Authors:  M S Bolat; M Özen; K Önem; A Açıkgöz; R Asci
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 2.896

7.  Relationship between sexual position and severity of penile fracture.

Authors:  R Barros; L Schulze; A A Ornellas; L Koifman; L A Favorito
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.896

8.  Sexual function outcomes and risk factors of erectile dysfunction after surgical repair of penile fracture.

Authors:  Gaurav Sharma; Soumendranath Mandal; Prasenjit Bhowmik; Prashant Gupta; Bandhan Bahal; Pramod Kumar Sharma
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-10-09

9.  Evaluation of epidemiology, concomitant urethral disruption and seasonal variation of penile fracture: A report of 86 cases.

Authors:  Mohammad Kazem Moslemi
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Sexual function outcomes following fracture of the penis.

Authors:  Gregory J Nason; Barry B McGuire; Stephen Liddy; Aisling Looney; Gerald M Lennon; David W Mulvin; David J Galvin; David M Quinlan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.