Literature DB >> 19137956

Endogenous and exogenous control of ecosystem function: N cycling in headwater streams.

H M Valett1, S A Thomas, P J Mulholland, J R Webster, C N Dahm, C S Fellows, C L Crenshaw, C G Peterson.   

Abstract

Allochthonous inputs act as resource subsidies to many ecosystems, where they exert strong influences on metabolism and material cycling. At the same time, metabolic theory proposes endogenous thermal control independent of resource supply. To address the relative importance of exogenous and endogenous influences, we quantified spatial and temporal variation in ecosystem metabolism and nitrogen (N) uptake using seasonal releases of 15N as nitrate in six streams differing in riparian-stream interaction and metabolic character. Nitrate removal was quantified using a nutrient spiraling approach based on measurements of downstream decline in 15N flux. Respiration (R) and gross primary production (GPP) were measured with whole-stream diel oxygen budgets. Uptake and metabolism metrics were addressed as z scores relative to site means to assess temporal variation. In open-canopied streams, areal uptake (U; microg N x m(-2) x s(-1)) was closely related to GPP, metabolic rates increased with temperature, and R was accurately predicted by metabolic scaling relationships. In forested streams, N spiraling was not related to GPP; instead, uptake velocity (v(f); mm/s) was closely related to R. In contrast to open-canopied streams, N uptake and metabolic activity were negatively correlated to temperature and poorly described by scaling laws. We contend that streams differ along a gradient of exogenous and endogenous control that relates to the relative influences of resource subsidies and in-stream energetics as determinants of seasonal patterns of metabolism and N cycling. Our research suggests that temporal variation in the propagation of ecological influence between adjacent systems generates phases when ecosystems are alternatively characterized as endogenously and exogenously controlled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19137956     DOI: 10.1890/07-1003.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  5 in total

Review 1.  Stream microbial diversity in response to environmental changes: review and synthesis of existing research.

Authors:  Lydia H Zeglin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 2.  Bridging Food Webs, Ecosystem Metabolism, and Biogeochemistry Using Ecological Stoichiometry Theory.

Authors:  Nina Welti; Maren Striebel; Amber J Ulseth; Wyatt F Cross; Stephen DeVilbiss; Patricia M Glibert; Laodong Guo; Andrew G Hirst; Jim Hood; John S Kominoski; Keeley L MacNeill; Andrew S Mehring; Jill R Welter; Helmut Hillebrand
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Contrasting community assembly processes structure lotic bacteria metacommunities along the river continuum.

Authors:  Hyun S Gweon; Michael J Bowes; Heather L Moorhouse; Anna E Oliver; Mark J Bailey; Michael C Acreman; Daniel S Read
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 5.491

4.  Ecosystem function in Appalachian headwater streams during an active invasion by the hemlock woolly adelgid.

Authors:  Robert M Northington; Jackson R Webster; Ernest F Benfield; Beth M Cheever; Barbara R Niederlehner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Taxonomic and Functional Differences between Microbial Communities in Qinghai Lake and Its Input Streams.

Authors:  Ze Ren; Fang Wang; Xiaodong Qu; James J Elser; Yang Liu; Limin Chu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-11-22       Impact factor: 5.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.