Literature DB >> 19137589

A novel system for evaluation of drug mixtures for potential efficacy in treating multidrug resistant cancers.

Daniel A Tatosian1, Michael L Shuler.   

Abstract

Multidrug resistant (MDR) cancer is difficult to treat. Chemicals that are effective MDR modulators have never exited clinical trials as FDA approved products due to side effects. It has been hypothesized that using a combination of chemotherapeutics with a mixture of MDR modulators (each with different side effects) may lead to useful treatment strategies. Because the experimental space for combination treatments can be large, this space may be impracticable to explore using animal studies. Here we describe an in vitro system based on microfabrication and cell culture that can potentially be used to explore large experimental spaces efficiently. The Microscale Cell Culture Analog (microCCA) concept mimics the body's response using interconnected compartments that represent various tissues or organs. A microCCA is based on the structure of an appropriate physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model and emulates the body's dynamic response to exposure to various drugs and chemicals. For this problem we have chosen a microCCA with living cells representing the liver (HepG2/C3A), bone marrow (MEG-01), uterine cancer (MES-SA), and a MDR variant of uterine cancer (MES-SA/DX-5). In proof of concept experiments we found in 24 h "acute" exposures and 72 h treatments that the microCCA system predicts combining the chemotherapeutic, doxorubicin, with cyclosporine and nicardipine, as MDR modulators will have greater efficacy than using doxorubicin by itself or with either modulator alone. This combined strategy is selective in inhibiting MES-SA/DX-5 cell proliferation and may prove to be advantageous in vivo by specifically targeting MDR cancer with acceptable side-effects. This cell specific synergy was not observed in traditional 96-well plate assays. By combining the microCCA with a PBPK model, appropriate drug doses and area under the curve exposure for in vivo trials can be extrapolated directly from the results obtained with this device. This device and approach should be useful in screening potential drug/modulator combinations to determine candidate treatments for MDR cancer. Indeed this approach may be useful for in vitro evaluation of human response to a wide range of exposures to mixtures of chemicals or drugs. Copyright 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19137589     DOI: 10.1002/bit.22219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  33 in total

Review 1.  Microfabrication technologies for oral drug delivery.

Authors:  Shilpa Sant; Sarah L Tao; Omar Z Fisher; Qiaobing Xu; Nicholas A Peppas; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 15.470

2.  Microfluidic separation of live and dead yeast cells using reservoir-based dielectrophoresis.

Authors:  Saurin Patel; Daniel Showers; Pallavi Vedantam; Tzuen-Rong Tzeng; Shizhi Qian; Xiangchun Xuan
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  A pumpless body-on-a-chip model using a primary culture of human intestinal cells and a 3D culture of liver cells.

Authors:  Huanhuan Joyce Chen; Paula Miller; Michael L Shuler
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 4.  Using physiologically-based pharmacokinetic-guided "body-on-a-chip" systems to predict mammalian response to drug and chemical exposure.

Authors:  Jong Hwan Sung; Balaji Srinivasan; Mandy Brigitte Esch; William T McLamb; Catia Bernabini; Michael L Shuler; James J Hickman
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2014-06-20

5.  Exploitation of physical and chemical constraints for three-dimensional microtissue construction in microfluidics.

Authors:  Deepak Choudhury; Xuejun Mo; Ciprian Iliescu; Loo Ling Tan; Wen Hao Tong; Hanry Yu
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.800

6.  Microfluidics in Malignant Glioma Research and Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Meghan Logun; Wujun Zhao; Leidong Mao; Lohitash Karumbaiah
Journal:  Adv Biosyst       Date:  2018-04-02

7.  Microfluidic organs-on-chips.

Authors:  Sangeeta N Bhatia; Donald E Ingber
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 8.  Organ-on-a-chip: development and clinical prospects toward toxicity assessment with an emphasis on bone marrow.

Authors:  Jeehye Kim; Hanna Lee; Šeila Selimović; Robert Gauvin; Hojae Bae
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 9.  Microfabricated mammalian organ systems and their integration into models of whole animals and humans.

Authors:  Jong H Sung; Mandy B Esch; Jean-Matthieu Prot; Christopher J Long; Alec Smith; James J Hickman; Michael L Shuler
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 10.  Bioreactor engineering of stem cell environments.

Authors:  Nina Tandon; Darja Marolt; Elisa Cimetta; Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 14.227

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.