Literature DB >> 19137442

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in carotid artery disease: does automated image registration improve image quality?

Jan Menke1, Jörg Larsen.   

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is a noninvasive imaging alternative to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for patients with carotid artery disease. In DSA, image quality can be improved by shifting the mask image if the patient has moved during angiography. This study investigated whether such image registration may also help to improve the image quality of carotid MRA. Data from 370 carotid MRA examinations of patients likely to have carotid artery disease were prospectively collected. The standard nonregistered MRAs were compared to automatically linear, affine and warp registered MRA by using three image quality parameters: the vessel detection probability (VDP) in maximum intensity projection (MIP) images, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in MIP images, and contrast-to-noise ratio in three-dimensional image volumes. A body shift of less than 1 mm occurred in 96.2% of cases. Analysis of variance revealed no significant influence of image registration and body shift on image quality (p > 0.05). In conclusion, standard contrast-enhanced carotid MRA usually requires no image registration to improve image quality and is generally robust against any naturally occurring body shift.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19137442     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1257-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  21 in total

1.  Comparison and evaluation of rigid, affine, and nonrigid registration of breast MR images.

Authors:  E R Denton; L I Sonoda; D Rueckert; S C Rankin; C Hayes; M O Leach; D L Hill; D J Hawkes
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Need for background suppression in contrast-enhanced peripheral magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  T Leiner; T T de Weert; R J Nijenhuis; G B Vasbinder; A G Kessels; K Y Ho; J M van Engelshoven
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J M Wardlaw; F M Chappell; J J K Best; K Wartolowska; E Berry
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Plaque and stent artifact reduction in subtraction CT angiography using nonrigid registration and a volume penalty.

Authors:  Dirk Loeckx; Stylianos Drisis; Frederik Maes; Dirk Vandermeulen; Guy Marchal; Paul Suetens
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2005

5.  Comparing several groups using analysis of variance.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-06-08

6.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation.

Authors:  R P Woods; S T Grafton; C J Holmes; S R Cherry; J C Mazziotta
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

7.  Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: co-sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline.

Authors:  Ralph L Sacco; Robert Adams; Greg Albers; Mark J Alberts; Oscar Benavente; Karen Furie; Larry B Goldstein; Philip Gorelick; Jonathan Halperin; Robert Harbaugh; S Claiborne Johnston; Irene Katzan; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Edgar J Kenton; Michael Marks; Lee H Schwamm; Thomas Tomsick
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-03-14       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Cervical CT angiography comparing routine noncontrast and a late venous scan as masks for automated bone subtraction: feasibility study and examination of the influence of patient motion on image quality.

Authors:  Michael M Lell; Hendrik Ditt; Christoph Panknin; James W Sayre; Ernst Klotz; Stefan G Ruehm; J Pablo Villablanca
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Nonrigid registration for subtraction CT angiography applied to the carotids and cranial arteries.

Authors:  Dirk Loeckx; Walter Coudyzer; Frederik Maes; Dirk Vandermeulen; Guido Wilms; Guy Marchal; Paul Suetens
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Color Doppler, power Doppler and B-flow ultrasound in the assessment of ICA stenosis: Comparison with 64-MD-CT angiography.

Authors:  D-A Clevert; T Johnson; E M Jung; D-A Clevert; P M Flach; T I Strautz; G Ritter; M T Gallegos; R Kubale; C Becker; M Reiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 7.034

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.