Literature DB >> 19136673

Anti-Müllerian hormone-based approach to controlled ovarian stimulation for assisted conception.

Scott M Nelson1, Robin W Yates, Helen Lyall, Maybeth Jamieson, Isabel Traynor, Marco Gaudoin, Paul Mitchell, Pat Ambrose, Richard Fleming.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Individualization of controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for assisted conception is complicated by variable ovarian response to follicle stimulating hormone. We hypothesized that anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), a predictor of oocyte yield, may facilitate treatment strategies for women undergoing COS, to optimize safety and clinical pregnancy rates.
METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 538 patients in two centres with differential COS strategies based on a centralized AMH measurement.
RESULTS: AMH was associated with oocyte yield after ovarian stimulation in both centres, and a 'reduced' AMH (1 to <5 pmol/l) was associated with a reduced clinical pregnancy rate. Women with a 'normal' AMH (5 to <15 pmol/l) treated with a long GnRH-agonist protocol (both centres) showed a low incidence of excess response (0%) and poor response (0%). In women with 'high' AMH (>15 pmol/l), the antagonist protocol eliminated the need for complete cryopreservation of embryos due to excess response (P < 0.001) and showed a higher fresh cycle clinical pregnancy rate than agonist cycles [OR 4.40 (95% CI 1.95-9.93), P < 0.001].
CONCLUSIONS: The use of circulating AMH to individualize treatment strategies for COS may result in reduced clinical risk, optimized treatment burden and maintained pregnancy rates, and is worthy of prospective randomized examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19136673     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  68 in total

1.  Different ART outcomes at increasing peak estradiol levels with long and antagonist protocols: retrospective insights from ten years experience.

Authors:  Massimo Manno; Marta Cervi; Donatella Zadro; Giuseppa Fuggetta; Valter Adamo; Francesco Tomei
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Different ovarian response by age in an anti-Müllerian hormone-matched group undergoing in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Honnma; Tsuyoshi Baba; Masahiro Sasaki; Yoshiki Hashiba; Hisanori Oguri; Takanori Fukunaga; Toshiaki Endo; Yoshimasa Asada
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Prediction of high ovarian response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: anti-Müllerian hormone versus small antral follicle count (2-6 mm).

Authors:  Abbas Aflatoonian; Homa Oskouian; Shahnaz Ahmadi; Leila Oskouian
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-06-20       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Anti-mullerian hormone as a predictive marker for the selection of women for oocyte in vitro maturation treatment.

Authors:  Rubens Fadini; Ruggero Comi; Mario Mignini Renzini; Giovanni Coticchio; Marilena Crippa; Elena De Ponti; Mariabeatrice Dal Canto
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle count as predictors for embryo/oocyte cryopreservation cycle outcomes in breast cancer patients stimulated with letrozole and follicle stimulating hormone.

Authors:  Sanghoon Lee; Sinan Ozkavukcu; Elke Heytens; Fred Moy; Rose M Alappat; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Anti-Müllerian hormone as a marker of ovarian reserve: What have we learned, and what should we know?

Authors:  Akira Iwase; Tomoko Nakamura; Satoko Osuka; Sachiko Takikawa; Maki Goto; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2015-11-23

7.  Serum anti-Müllerian hormone predicts ovarian response and cycle outcome in IVF patients.

Authors:  Cheng-Hsuan Wu; Yu-Ching Chen; Hsin-Hung Wu; Jyuer-Ger Yang; Yu-Jun Chang; Horng-Der Tsai
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  The anti mullerian hormone- a novel marker for assessing the ovarian reserve in women with regular menstrual cycles.

Authors:  V S Kalaiselvi; Saikumar P; Prabhu K; Prashanth Krishna G
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2012-11-12

9.  Avoiding OHSS: Controlled Ovarian Low-Dose Stimulation in Women with PCOS.

Authors:  D Fischer; C Reisenbüchler; S Rösner; J Haussmann; P Wimberger; M Goeckenjan
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 10.  Biological versus chronological ovarian age: implications for assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Carlo Alviggi; Peter Humaidan; Colin M Howles; Donald Tredway; Stephen G Hillier
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.