Literature DB >> 19136642

Beyond polarization, public preferences suggest policy opportunities to address aging, dying, and family caregiving.

Ira R Byock1, Yvonne J Corbeil, Martha E Goodrich.   

Abstract

Despite well-documented deficiencies and widespread suffering experienced by millions of elderly or ill Americans and their families, politicians rarely address end-of-life issues. Citizen Forums in New Hampshire surveyed 463 people regarding aging, serious illness, and caregiving. More than 80% indicated it was very or extremely important to have their dignity respected, preferences honored, pain controlled, and to not leave family with debt. Less than half strongly endorsed being kept alive as long as possible, prayed with or for, or having assisted-suicide available. Over 80% strongly endorsed palliative care requirements clinical licensure and reimbursement, expansion of family caregiver leave, respite care, and bereavement support. By avoiding actions which elicit strong divergence of opinion and focusing on actions on which consensus exists, public officials and candidates can respond to problems and improve care and experience for frail elders, dying Americans, and their families.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19136642     DOI: 10.1177/1049909108328700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care        ISSN: 1049-9091            Impact factor:   2.500


  3 in total

1.  Cancer patients' preferences for control at the end of life.

Authors:  Deborah L Volker; Hung-Lan Wu
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2011-07-06

2.  Challenges Facing Families at the End of Life in Three Settings.

Authors:  Karen A Kehl; Karin T Kirchhoff; Betty J Kramer; Cyndi Hovland-Scafe
Journal:  J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care       Date:  2009-07-01

3.  Priorities for action in a rural older adults study.

Authors:  Jennifer B Averill
Journal:  Fam Community Health       Date:  2012 Oct-Dec
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.