Literature DB >> 19136304

Long-term follow up (37-69 years) of patients with bladder exstrophy treated with ureterosigmoidostomy: uro-nephrological outcome.

Rita Gobet1, Daniel Weber, Pietro Renzulli, Christian Kellenberger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the urological and nephrological long-term outcome of patients born with classical bladder exstrophy treated with bilateral ureterosigmoidostomies in early childhood. PATIENTS AND
METHOD: Out of 42 patients born with bladder exstrophy in Switzerland between 1937 and 1968, 25 participated in this study; seven had died, seven were lost to follow up and three refused consent. Assessment included chart review, clinical examination, and assessment of renal function and morphology.
RESULTS: After a follow-up period of 37-69 years ((mean 50 years), 13 of the 25 participants (52%) had their ureterosigmoidostomy still in place. All others had different forms of urinary diversions. Fifteen (60%) patients had normal renal function or mild chronic kidney disease as assessed by estimated glomerular filtration rate. Three patients were on renal replacement therapy. MRI (n=16) showed 10 morphologically normal kidneys. One patient suffered from adenocarcinoma of the colon, five had benign colonic polyps, one urethral papillary carcinoma and 18 no evidence of tumor.
CONCLUSION: The majority of our patients have normal or mildly impaired renal function and a well functioning ureterosigmoidostomy. This is remarkable, given the fact that ureterosigmoidostomies are considered to be refluxing high-pressure reservoirs at risk of renal injury and malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19136304     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2008.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  6 in total

1.  Preservation of renal function in the modern staged repair of classic bladder exstrophy.

Authors:  Anthony J Schaeffer; Andrew A Stec; Nima Baradaran; John P Gearhart; Ranjiv I Mathews
Journal:  J Pediatr Urol       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 1.830

2.  [Secondary malignancies in urinary diversions].

Authors:  T Kälble; I Hofmann; J W Thüroff; R Stein; R Hautmann; H Riedmiller; D Vergho; L Hertle; C Wülfing; M Truß; S Roth; F C von Rundstedt; P Albers; J Gschwend; K Herkommer; U Humke; M Spahn; P Bader; J Steffens; R Harzmann; C G Stief; A Karl; S C Müller; M Waldner; J Noldus; K Kleinschmidt; P Alken; B Kopper; M Fisch; A Lampel; A Stenzel; J Fichtner; B Flath; H Rübben; K P Juenemann; S Hautmann; A Knipper; D Leusmann; W Strohmaier; W F Thon; S Miller; K Weingärtner; A Schilling; H Piechota; J E Becht; H Schwaibold; P Bub; S Conrad; U Wenderoth; W Merkle; W Rösch; T Otto; B Ulshöfer; M Westenfelder
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Carcinoma arising in enteric diversion or rectal neobladder for bladder exstrophy.

Authors:  R Ragu; G Meurette; M Kim; L Le Normand; P A Lehur
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2016-09-03       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  [Tumors following urinary diversions. Results of a multicenter study].

Authors:  T Kälble; I Hofmann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Exstrophy Bladder - Reconstruction or Diversion for the Underprivileged.

Authors:  Yogesh Kumar Sarin; Virender Sekhon
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  Exstrophy epispadias complex- Issues beyond the initial repair.

Authors:  Jai K Mahajan; Kattragadda L N Rao
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.