Literature DB >> 19136284

The potential role of MRI in veterinary clinical cardiology.

Stephen H Gilbert1, Fraser J McConnell, Arun V Holden, Mohan U Sivananthan, Joanna Dukes-McEwan.   

Abstract

Over the last decade, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become established as a useful referral diagnostic method in veterinary medicine that is widely used in small animal brain and spinal diseases, aural, nasal and orbital disorders, planning soft tissue surgery, oncology and small animal and equine orthopaedics. The use of MRI in these disciplines has grown due to its unparalleled capability to image soft tissue structures. This has been exploited in human cardiology where, despite the inherent difficulties in imaging a moving, contractile structure, cardiac MRI (CMRI) has become the optimal technique for the morphological assessment and quantification of ventricular function. Both CMRI hardware and software systems have developed rapidly in the last 10 years but although several preliminary veterinary CMRI studies have been reported, the technique's growth has been limited and is currently used primarily in clinical research. A review of published studies is presented with a description of CMRI technology and the potential of CMRI is discussed along with some of the reasons for its limited usage. Copyright (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19136284     DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2008.11.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet J        ISSN: 1090-0233            Impact factor:   2.688


  5 in total

1.  Effects of two different anesthetic protocols on cardiac flow measured by two dimensional phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Randi Drees; Rebecca A Johnson; Rebecca L Stepien; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Christopher J François
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 1.363

2.  QUANTITATIVE PLANAR AND VOLUMETRIC CARDIAC MEASUREMENTS USING 64 MDCT AND 3T MRI VS. STANDARD 2D AND M-MODE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY: DOES ANESTHETIC PROTOCOL MATTER?

Authors:  Randi Drees; Rebecca A Johnson; Rebecca L Stepien; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Jimmy H Saunders; Christopher J François
Journal:  Vet Radiol Ultrasound       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 1.363

3.  Imperforated cor triatriatum dexter in a dog with concurrent caudal vena cava wall mineralization.

Authors:  Tetyda Paulina Dobak; Gregory Starrak; Kathleen Linn; Elisabeth Christine Roberston Snead
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 1.695

4.  Quantification of right ventricular volume in dogs: a comparative study between three-dimensional echocardiography and computed tomography with the reference method magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Anne K Sieslack; Peter Dziallas; Ingo Nolte; Patrick Wefstaedt; Stephan O Hungerbühler
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Quantification of left ventricular volumes and function in anesthetized beagles using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: 4D-TomTec™ analysis versus 4D-AutLVQ™ analysis in comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Judith Eskofier; Patrick Wefstaedt; Martin Beyerbach; Ingo Nolte; Stephan O Hungerbühler
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.741

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.