Literature DB >> 19135509

Studies on the in vitro genotoxicity of baytubes, agglomerates of engineered multi-walled carbon-nanotubes (MWCNT).

U Wirnitzer1, B Herbold, M Voetz, J Ragot.   

Abstract

The increasing production and expanding application of nanoparticles in multiple aspects of life necessitate reliable safety assessment. In this context we here report on the evaluation of the potential genotoxicity of baytubes, i.e. agglomerates of multi-walled carbon-nanotubes (MWCNT). Testing for chromosome aberrations was done in V79 cells and for gene mutations in the Salmonella microsome test. Baytubes were formulated in deionised water at 10 mg/ml and treated with ultrasound for 30 min at 25 degrees C. Particle size distribution was determined under the incubation conditions in the in vitro studies. In the chromosome aberration test V79 cells (OECD TG 473) were exposed in the absence or presence of S9 mix for 4 h to concentrations of 2.5, 5 and 10 microg/ml of baytubes (visible from concentration of 5 microg/ml and higher). Harvest was 18 h after the beginning of the treatment. In addition, cells treated with 10 microg/ml were harvested 30 h after the beginning of the treatment. An additional experiment was performed using continuous treatment at 2.5, 5 and 10 microg/ml for 18 h (no S9 mix) with subsequent harvest. Under these conditions and in the concentration range tested there were no cytotoxic and no clastogenic effects. In the Salmonella microsome (Ames) test (OECD TG 471) concentrations up to 5000 microg/plate were tested in Salmonella typhimurium (strains TA 1535, TA 100, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 102) in the absence or presence of S9 mix. Under these conditions and in the concentration range tested there were no bacteriotoxic and no mutagenic effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19135509     DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.11.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Lett        ISSN: 0378-4274            Impact factor:   4.372


  14 in total

Review 1.  Practical considerations for conducting ecotoxicity test methods with manufactured nanomaterials: what have we learnt so far?

Authors:  Richard D Handy; Nico van den Brink; Mark Chappell; Martin Mühling; Renata Behra; Maria Dušinská; Peter Simpson; Jukka Ahtiainen; Awadhesh N Jha; Jennifer Seiter; Anthony Bednar; Alan Kennedy; Teresa F Fernandes; Michael Riediker
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 2.823

Review 2.  Safe clinical use of carbon nanotubes as innovative biomaterials.

Authors:  Naoto Saito; Hisao Haniu; Yuki Usui; Kaoru Aoki; Kazuo Hara; Seiji Takanashi; Masayuki Shimizu; Nobuyo Narita; Masanori Okamoto; Shinsuke Kobayashi; Hiroki Nomura; Hiroyuki Kato; Naoyuki Nishimura; Seiichi Taruta; Morinobu Endo
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  Evaluating the mechanistic evidence and key data gaps in assessing the potential carcinogenicity of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers in humans.

Authors:  Eileen D Kuempel; Marie-Claude Jaurand; Peter Møller; Yasuo Morimoto; Norihiro Kobayashi; Kent E Pinkerton; Linda M Sargent; Roel C H Vermeulen; Bice Fubini; Agnes B Kane
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 5.635

4.  Potential for exposure to engineered nanoparticles from nanotechnology-based consumer spray products.

Authors:  Yevgen Nazarenko; Tae Won Han; Paul J Lioy; Gediminas Mainelis
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 5.563

5.  Current studies into the genotoxic effects of nanomaterials.

Authors:  Cheng-Teng Ng; Jasmine J Li; Boon-Huat Bay; Lin-Yue Lanry Yung
Journal:  J Nucleic Acids       Date:  2010-09-21

6.  Evaluation of Maternal Toxicity in Rats Exposed to Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes during Pregnancy.

Authors:  Jeong-Hyeon Lim; Sung-Hwan Kim; In-Chul Lee; Changjong Moon; Sung-Ho Kim; Dong-Ho Shin; Hyoung-Chin Kim; Jong-Choon Kim
Journal:  Environ Health Toxicol       Date:  2011-04-14

7.  In vitro genotoxicity testing strategy for nanomaterials and the adaptation of current OECD guidelines.

Authors:  S H Doak; B Manshian; G J S Jenkins; N Singh
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  In vitro chromosomal aberrations induced by various shapes of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs).

Authors:  Toshiaki Sasaki; Masumi Asakura; Chigusa Ishioka; Tatsuya Kasai; Taku Katagiri; Shoji Fukushima
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  Mesothelioma: Do asbestos and carbon nanotubes pose the same health risk?

Authors:  Marie-Claude F Jaurand; Annie Renier; Julien Daubriac
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 9.400

10.  Carboxylated short single-walled carbon nanotubes but not plain and multi-walled short carbon nanotubes show in vitro genotoxicity.

Authors:  Maria Mrakovcic; Claudia Meindl; Gerd Leitinger; Eva Roblegg; Eleonore Fröhlich
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.