Literature DB >> 19134545

Monitoring tissue engineering using magnetic resonance imaging.

Huihui Xu1, Shadi F Othman, Richard L Magin.   

Abstract

Assessment of tissue regeneration is essential to optimize the stages of tissue engineering (cell proliferation, tissue development and implantation). Optical and X-ray imaging have been used in tissue engineering to provide useful information, but each has limitations: for example, poor depth penetration and radiation damage. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) largely overcomes these restrictions, exhibits high resolution (approximately 100 microm) and can be applied both in vitro and in vivo. Recently, MRI has been used in tissue engineering to generate spatial maps of tissue relaxation times (T(1), T(2)), water diffusion coefficients, and the stiffness (shear moduli) of developing engineered tissues. In addition, through the use of paramagnetic and superparamagnetic contrast agents, MRI can quantify cell death, assess inflammation, and visualize cell trafficking and gene expression. After tissue implantation MRI can be used to observe the integration of a tissue implant with the surrounding tissues, and to check for early signs of immune rejection. In this review, we describe and evaluate the growing role of MRI in the assessment of tissue engineered constructs. First, we briefly describe the underlying principles of MRI and the expected changes in relaxation times (T(1), T(2)) and the water diffusion coefficient that are the basis for MR contrast in developing tissues. Next, we describe how MRI can be applied to evaluate the tissue engineering of mesenchymal tissues (bone, cartilage, and fat). Finally, we outline how MRI can be used to monitor tissue structure, composition, and function to improve the entire tissue engineering process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19134545     DOI: 10.1263/jbb.106.515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biosci Bioeng        ISSN: 1347-4421            Impact factor:   2.894


  34 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance elastography methodology for the evaluation of tissue engineered construct growth.

Authors:  Evan T Curtis; Simeng Zhang; Vahid Khalilzad-Sharghi; Thomas Boulet; Shadi F Othman
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Label-free magnetic resonance imaging to locate live cells in three-dimensional porous scaffolds.

Authors:  A Abarrategi; M E Fernandez-Valle; T Desmet; D Castejón; A Civantos; C Moreno-Vicente; V Ramos; J V Sanz-Casado; F J Martínez-Vázquez; P Dubruel; P Miranda; J L López-Lacomba
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Taking a deep look: modern microscopy technologies to optimize the design and functionality of biocompatible scaffolds for tissue engineering in regenerative medicine.

Authors:  M Vielreicher; S Schürmann; R Detsch; M A Schmidt; A Buttgereit; A Boccaccini; O Friedrich
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Functional ultrasound imaging for assessment of extracellular matrix scaffolds used for liver organoid formation.

Authors:  Ryan C Gessner; Ariel D Hanson; Steven Feingold; Avery T Cashion; Ana Corcimaru; Bryant T Wu; Christopher R Mullins; Stephen R Aylward; Lola M Reid; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 12.479

5.  Biomimetic extracellular matrix-incorporated scaffold induces osteogenic gene expression in human marrow stromal cells.

Authors:  Sriram Ravindran; Qi Gao; Mrignayani Kotecha; Richard L Magin; Sachin Karol; Ana Bedran-Russo; Anne George
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  Imaging strategies for tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Seung Yun Nam; Laura M Ricles; Laura J Suggs; Stanislav Y Emelianov
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 7.  Automating the processing steps for obtaining bone tissue-engineered substitutes: from imaging tools to bioreactors.

Authors:  Pedro F Costa; Albino Martins; Nuno M Neves; Manuela E Gomes; Rui L Reis
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 6.389

8.  Bone Physiology, Biomaterial and the Effect of Mechanical/Physical Microenvironment on MSC Osteogenesis: A Tribute to Shu Chien's 80th Birthday.

Authors:  Xiaoling Liao; Shaoying Lu; Yue Zhuo; Christina Winter; Wenfeng Xu; Bo Li; Yingxiao Wang
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.321

9.  Mechanical analysis of an axially symmetric cylindrical phantom with a spherical heterogeneity for MR elastography.

Authors:  Benjamin L Schwartz; Ziying Yin; Richard L Magin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Application of sodium triple-quantum coherence NMR spectroscopy for the study of growth dynamics in cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Mrignayani Kotecha; Sriram Ravindran; Thomas M Schmid; Aishwarya Vaidyanathan; Anne George; Richard L Magin
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-02-03       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.