AIM: To determine whether resin-based sealer cements are able to strengthen root dentine, as measured by work of fracture (Wf), micro-punch shear strength (MPSS) and resistance to vertical root fracture (VRF). METHODOLOGY:One hundred and twenty extracted premolar teeth were randomly assigned amongst four treatments before testing: intact, root canals prepared but unfilled, or root filled using epoxy- or urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA)-based sealer (plus core material). Samples were then prepared for measuring Wf, MPSS or VRF using standard test procedures. Data were analyzed using one-way anova with significance set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: For all three tests, root canals filled using epoxy resin-based sealer were not statistically significantly different compared with UDMA resin (P = 1 for Wf, P = 0.7 for MPSS and P = 0.12 for VRF), or different from both sound and prepared dentine (P > 0.05). There was also no significant difference between sound dentine and prepared dentine for both Wf (P = 0.92) and resistance to VRF (P = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Neither epoxy nor UDMA resins used as sealer cements enhanced fracture resistance of root dentine when placed within root canals of extracted teeth.
RCT Entities:
AIM: To determine whether resin-based sealer cements are able to strengthen root dentine, as measured by work of fracture (Wf), micro-punch shear strength (MPSS) and resistance to vertical root fracture (VRF). METHODOLOGY: One hundred and twenty extracted premolar teeth were randomly assigned amongst four treatments before testing: intact, root canals prepared but unfilled, or root filled using epoxy- or urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA)-based sealer (plus core material). Samples were then prepared for measuring Wf, MPSS or VRF using standard test procedures. Data were analyzed using one-way anova with significance set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: For all three tests, root canals filled using epoxy resin-based sealer were not statistically significantly different compared with UDMA resin (P = 1 for Wf, P = 0.7 for MPSS and P = 0.12 for VRF), or different from both sound and prepared dentine (P > 0.05). There was also no significant difference between sound dentine and prepared dentine for both Wf (P = 0.92) and resistance to VRF (P = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Neither epoxy nor UDMA resins used as sealer cements enhanced fracture resistance of root dentine when placed within root canals of extracted teeth.
Authors: Manuel Toledano; Esther Muñoz-Soto; Fátima S Aguilera; Estrella Osorio; Mayra C Pérez-Álvarez; José Ad García-Menocal; Manuel Toledano-Osorio; Raquel Osorio Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2019-05-17 Impact factor: 3.573