Literature DB >> 19133850

North Carolina Disease Event Tracking and Epidemiologic Collection Tool (NC DETECT) and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS): comparison of emergency department data.

Anne M Hakenewerth1, Anna E Waller, Amy I Ising, Judith E Tintinalli.   

Abstract

The North Carolina Disease Event Tracking and Epidemiologic Collection Tool (NC DETECT) is a near-real-time database of emergency department (ED) visits automatically extracted from hospital information system(s) in the state of North Carolina. The National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) is a retrospective probability sample survey of visits to U.S. hospital EDs. This report compares data from NC DETECT (2006) with NHAMCS (2005) ED visit data to determine if the two data sets are consistent. Proportions, rates, and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for ED visits by age and gender; arrival method and age; expected source of payment; disposition; hospital admissions; NHAMCS top 20 diagnosis groups and top five primary diagnoses by age group; International Classifications of Disease, 9th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) primary diagnosis codes; and cause of injury. North Carolina DETECT captured 79% of statewide ED visits. Twenty-eight persons for every 100 North Carolina residents visited a North Carolina ED that reports to NC DETECT at least once in 2006, compared to 20% nationally. Twenty-seven percent of ED visits in North Carolina had private insurance as the expected payment source, compared with 40% nationwide. The proportion of injury-related ED visits in North Carolina is 25%, compared to 36.4% nationally. Rates and proportions of disease groups are similar. Similarity of NC DETECT rates and proportions to NHAMCS provides support for the face and content validity of NC DETECT. The development of statewide near-real-time ED databases is an important step toward the collection, aggregation, and analysis of timely, population-based data by state, to better define the burden of illness and injury for vulnerable populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19133850     DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00334.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  16 in total

1.  Primary care availability and emergency department use by older adults: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Katherine M Hunold; Natalie L Richmond; Anna E Waller; Malcolm P Cutchin; Paul R Voss; Timothy F Platts-Mills
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Use of ED and hospital services for patients with acute leukemia after induction therapy: one year follow-up.

Authors:  Ashley Leak Bryant; Allison M Deal; AnnMarie Walton; William A Wood; Hyman Muss; Deborah K Mayer
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.156

3.  Study designs and evaluation models for emergency department public health research.

Authors:  Kerry B Broderick; Megan L Ranney; Federico E Vaca; Gail D'Onofrio; Richard E Rothman; Karin V Rhodes; Bruce Becker; Jason S Haukoos
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Research using emergency department-related data sets: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Jon Mark Hirshon; Margaret Warner; Charlene B Irvin; Richard W Niska; Daniel A Andersen; Gordon S Smith; Linda F McCaig
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  Why do patients with cancer visit emergency departments? Results of a 2008 population study in North Carolina.

Authors:  Deborah K Mayer; Debbie Travers; Annah Wyss; Ashley Leak; Anna Waller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Patient throughput times and inflow patterns in Swedish emergency departments. A basis for ANSWER, A National SWedish Emergency Registry.

Authors:  Ulf Ekelund; Lisa Kurland; Fredrik Eklund; Paulus Torkki; Anna Letterstål; Per Lindmarker; Maaret Castrén
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Advancing a framework to enable characterization and evaluation of data streams useful for biosurveillance.

Authors:  Kristen J Margevicius; Nicholas Generous; Kirsten J Taylor-McCabe; Mac Brown; W Brent Daniel; Lauren Castro; Andrea Hengartner; Alina Deshpande
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Influence of urbanicity and county characteristics on the association between ozone and asthma emergency department visits in North Carolina.

Authors:  Jason D Sacks; Ana G Rappold; J Allen Davis; David B Richardson; Anna E Waller; Thomas J Luben
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Cardio-respiratory outcomes associated with exposure to wildfire smoke are modified by measures of community health.

Authors:  Ana G Rappold; Wayne E Cascio; Vasu J Kilaru; Susan L Stone; Lucas M Neas; Robert B Devlin; David Diaz-Sanchez
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  Automated detection of influenza-like illness using clinical surveillance markers at a Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center.

Authors:  Lawrence P Park; Supriya Rao; Scott A Nabity; David Abbott; Joyce Frederick; Christopher W Woods
Journal:  Emerg Health Threats J       Date:  2011-04-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.