OBJECT: Cytogenetic studies of chordomas are scarce and show multiple changes involving different chromosomes. These abnormalities are implicated in the pathogenesis of chordoma, but the clinical significance of these changes is yet to be determined. In this study, the authors discuss the cytogenetic changes in a large series of skull base chordomas with long-term follow-up and focus on the impact of these changes on the prognosis, progression, and management of the disease. METHODS: The karyotypes of chordomas in 64 patients (36 men and 28 women) were studied in relation to survival and recurrence or progression over a mean follow-up period of 48 +/- 37.5 months. The standard G-banding technique was used for karyotype analysis. Statistical analysis was performed with the Fisher exact test and ORs, and Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for survival and recurrence/progression of disease. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent of de novo chordomas had normal karyotypes and a 3% recurrence rate; there was a 45% recurrence rate in de novo tumors with abnormal karyotypes (p < 0.01). Recurrent tumors were associated with a high incidence of abnormal karyotype (75%). The OR for recurrence in lesions with an abnormal versus a normal karyotype was 12. Aberrations in chromosomes 3, 4, 12, 13, and 14 were associated with frequent recurrence and decreased survival time. Ninety-five percent of cases with progression involved chromosome 3 and/or 13. The median survival time was 4 months when both of these chromosomes had aberrations (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Chordomas with normal karyotypes were associated with a low rate of recurrence and a long patient survival, and recurrent chordomas were associated with an abnormal karyotype, disease progression, and poor survival. De novo chordomas with normal karyotypes may be amenable to radical resection and adjunctive proton beam therapy. Recurrent and de novo chordomas with abnormal karyotypes were associated with complex cytogenetic abnormalities and a poor prognosis, particularly in the presence of aberrations underlying tumor progression in chromosomes 3, 4, 12, 13, and 14.
OBJECT: Cytogenetic studies of chordomas are scarce and show multiple changes involving different chromosomes. These abnormalities are implicated in the pathogenesis of chordoma, but the clinical significance of these changes is yet to be determined. In this study, the authors discuss the cytogenetic changes in a large series of skull base chordomas with long-term follow-up and focus on the impact of these changes on the prognosis, progression, and management of the disease. METHODS: The karyotypes of chordomas in 64 patients (36 men and 28 women) were studied in relation to survival and recurrence or progression over a mean follow-up period of 48 +/- 37.5 months. The standard G-banding technique was used for karyotype analysis. Statistical analysis was performed with the Fisher exact test and ORs, and Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for survival and recurrence/progression of disease. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent of de novo chordomas had normal karyotypes and a 3% recurrence rate; there was a 45% recurrence rate in de novo tumors with abnormal karyotypes (p < 0.01). Recurrent tumors were associated with a high incidence of abnormal karyotype (75%). The OR for recurrence in lesions with an abnormal versus a normal karyotype was 12. Aberrations in chromosomes 3, 4, 12, 13, and 14 were associated with frequent recurrence and decreased survival time. Ninety-five percent of cases with progression involved chromosome 3 and/or 13. The median survival time was 4 months when both of these chromosomes had aberrations (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS:Chordomas with normal karyotypes were associated with a low rate of recurrence and a long patient survival, and recurrent chordomas were associated with an abnormal karyotype, disease progression, and poor survival. De novo chordomas with normal karyotypes may be amenable to radical resection and adjunctive proton beam therapy. Recurrent and de novo chordomas with abnormal karyotypes were associated with complex cytogenetic abnormalities and a poor prognosis, particularly in the presence of aberrations underlying tumor progression in chromosomes 3, 4, 12, 13, and 14.
Authors: Beatriz A Walter; Maria Begnami; Vladimir A Valera; Mariarita Santi; Elisabeth J Rushing; Martha Quezado Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2010-07-10 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Roberto Jose Diaz; Mustafa Guduk; Rocco Romagnuolo; Christian A Smith; Paul Northcott; David Shih; Fitim Berisha; Adrienne Flanagan; David G Munoz; Michael D Cusimano; M Necmettin Pamir; James T Rutka Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Samantha E Hoffman; Sally A Al Abdulmohsen; Saksham Gupta; Blake M Hauser; David M Meredith; Ian F Dunn; Wenya Linda Bi Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2020-07-08 Impact factor: 4.003