Literature DB >> 19133168

Carotid bruit for detection of hemodynamically significant carotid stenosis: the Northern Manhattan Study.

Elizabeth V Ratchford1, Zhezhen Jin, Marco R Di Tullio, Maya J Salameh, Shunichi Homma, Robert Gan, Bernadette Boden-Albala, Ralph L Sacco, Tatjana Rundek.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of carotid bruits and the utility of auscultation for predicting carotid stenosis are not well known. We aimed to establish the prevalence of carotid bruits and the diagnostic accuracy of auscultation for detection of hemodynamically significant carotid stenosis, using carotid duplex as the gold standard.
METHODS: The Northern Manhattan Study (NOMAS) is a prospective multiethnic community-based cohort designed to examine the incidence of stroke and other vascular events and the association between various vascular risk factors and subclinical atherosclerosis. Of the stroke-free cohort (n=3298), 686 were examined for carotid bruits and underwent carotid duplex. Main outcome measures included prevalence of carotid bruits and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of auscultation for prediction of ipsilateral carotid stenosis.
RESULTS: Among 686 subjects with a mean age of 68.2 +/- 9.4 years, the prevalence of >/=60% carotid stenosis as detected by ultrasound was 2.2% and the prevalence of carotid bruits was 4.1%. For detection of carotid stenosis, sensitivity of auscultation was 56%, specificity was 98%, positive predictive value was 25%, negative predictive value was 99% and overall accuracy was 97.5%. DISCUSSION: In this ethnically diverse cohort, the prevalence of carotid bruits and hemodynamically significant carotid stenosis was low. Sensitivity and positive predictive value were also low, and the 44% false-negative rate suggests that auscultation is not sufficient to exclude carotid stenosis. While the presence of a bruit may still warrant further evaluation with carotid duplex, ultrasonography may be considered in high-risk asymptomatic patients, irrespective of findings on auscultation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19133168      PMCID: PMC2727568          DOI: 10.1179/174313209X382458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Res        ISSN: 0161-6412            Impact factor:   2.448


  14 in total

1.  Cardiac auscultation. A glorious past--but does it have a future?

Authors:  M E Tavel
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1996-03-15       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Predictive value of cervical bruit for the detection of obstructive lesions of the internal carotid artery. Data from 2000 patients.

Authors:  M Floriani; S M Giulini; G P Anzola; S Bonardelii; N Portolani; M P Pasolini; G Tiberio
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1989-06

3.  Correlation of bruits over the carotid artery with angiographically demonstrated lesions.

Authors:  D K Ziegler; T Zileli; A Dick; J L Sebaugh
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 9.910

4.  The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have a clinically important carotid bruit?

Authors:  J S Sauvé; A Laupacis; T Ostbye; B Feagan; D L Sackett
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-12-15       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Do carotid bruits predict disease of the internal carotid arteries?

Authors:  K N Davies; P R Humphrey
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.401

6.  Effects of ramipril and vitamin E on atherosclerosis: the study to evaluate carotid ultrasound changes in patients treated with ramipril and vitamin E (SECURE).

Authors:  E Lonn; S Yusuf; V Dzavik; C Doris; Q Yi; S Smith; A Moore-Cox; J Bosch; W Riley; K Teo
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Effect of rosuvastatin on progression of carotid intima-media thickness in low-risk individuals with subclinical atherosclerosis: the METEOR Trial.

Authors:  John R Crouse; Joel S Raichlen; Ward A Riley; Gregory W Evans; Mike K Palmer; Daniel H O'Leary; Diederick E Grobbee; Michiel L Bots
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-03-25       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Utility of routine carotid duplex screening in patients who have claudication.

Authors:  J Marek; J L Mills; J Harvich; H Cui; R M Fujitani
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Carotid artery auscultation--anachronism or useful screening procedure?

Authors:  M Tünde Magyar; Eun-Mi Nam; László Csiba; Martin A Ritter; E Bernd Ringelstein; Dirk W Droste
Journal:  Neurol Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.448

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Medical and Revascularization Therapies for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.

Authors:  Sushrut Dharmadhikari; Seemant Chaturvedi
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Internal carotid artery stenosis presenting as ipsilateral posterior cerebral artery ischaemic stroke: a lesson to be learnt.

Authors:  Jonathan Michael Hunter; Sanaz Kahlili Tehrani; Tanya Wood; Richard Geraghty
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-04-22

Review 3.  Carotid Artery Stenosis: Medical Therapy, Surgery, and Stenting.

Authors:  Sushrut Dharmakidari; Pratik Bhattacharya; Seemant Chaturvedi
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 4.  Radiation-induced carotid artery stenosis: a comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Jiaping Xu; Yongjun Cao
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2014-08

5.  Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

Authors:  James F Meschia; Cheryl Bushnell; Bernadette Boden-Albala; Lynne T Braun; Dawn M Bravata; Seemant Chaturvedi; Mark A Creager; Robert H Eckel; Mitchell S V Elkind; Myriam Fornage; Larry B Goldstein; Steven M Greenberg; Susanna E Horvath; Costantino Iadecola; Edward C Jauch; Wesley S Moore; John A Wilson
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Prediction of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the general population: identification of high-risk groups.

Authors:  Marjolein de Weerd; Jacoba P Greving; Bo Hedblad; Matthias W Lorenz; Ellisiv B Mathiesen; Daniel H O'Leary; Maria Rosvall; Matthias Sitzer; Gert Jan de Borst; Erik Buskens; Michiel L Bots
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Is B-mode ultrasound alone a sufficient screening tool for carotid stenosis? A pilot study.

Authors:  Tina Bhandari; Steven J Socransky
Journal:  Crit Ultrasound J       Date:  2014-10-01

Review 8.  Why are we still debating criteria for carotid artery stenosis?

Authors:  Victor J Del Brutto; Heather L Gornik; Tatjana Rundek
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.