Literature DB >> 19133095

Apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria following use of various instrumentation techniques.

A Kuştarci1, K E Akpinar, Z Sümer, K Er, B Bek.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the number of bacteria extruded apically from extracted teeth ex vivo after canal instrumentation using a manual technique and three engine-driven techniques utilizing nickel-titanium instruments (K3, RaCe, and FlexMaster).
METHODOLOGY: Seventy extracted human mandibular premolar teeth with similar dimensions were used. Access cavities were prepared and root canals were then contaminated with a suspension of Enterococcus faecalis and then dried. The contaminated roots were divided into four experimental groups of 15 teeth each and one control group of 10 teeth. G1. RaCe group: the root canals were instrumented using RaCe instruments. G2. K3 group: the root canals were instrumented using K3 instruments. G3. FlexMaster group: the root canals were instrumented using FlexMaster instruments. G4. Manual technique group: the root canals were instrumented using K-type stainless steel instruments. G5. CONTROL GROUP: no instrumentation was attempted. Bacteria extruded from the apical foramen during instrumentation were collected into vials. The resultant microbiological samples were removed from the vials and then incubated in culture media for 24 h. The number of colony-forming units (CFU) was determined for each sample. The data obtained were analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney U-tests, with alpha = 0.05 as the level for statistical significance.
RESULTS: There was a significant difference between experimental-control and engine-driven-manual technique groups (P < 0.05). The manual technique was associated with the greatest extrusion of microorganism.
CONCLUSIONS: All instrumentation techniques extruded intracanal bacteria apically. No significant difference was found in the number of CFU among the engine-driven techniques; manual techniques extruded significantly more microorganisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19133095     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01470.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Endod J        ISSN: 0143-2885            Impact factor:   5.264


  12 in total

1.  Apical debris extrusion associated with oval shaped canals: a comparative study of WaveOne vs Self-Adjusting File.

Authors:  Eleftherios Terry R Farmakis; G G Sotiropoulos; I Abràmovitz; M Solomonov
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparative evaluation of apical extrusion of debris and irrigant with three rotary instruments using crown down technique - An in vitro study.

Authors:  Rahul Jindal; Smita Singh; Siddharth Gupta; Punita Jindal
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2012-06-19

3.  Apical extrusion of debris and irrigant using hand and rotary systems: A comparative study.

Authors:  Sheetal B Ghivari; Girish C Kubasad; Manoj G Chandak; Nr Akarte
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2011-04

4.  Quantitative evaluation of apical extrusion of intracanal bacteria using K3, Mtwo, RaCe and protaper rotary systems: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Roopadevi Garlapati; Bhuvan Shome Venigalla; Jayaprakash D Patil; Rvsc Raju; Chintamani Rammohan
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-07

5.  Quantitative evaluation of apically extruded debris during root canal instrumentation with ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, WaveOne, and self-adjusting file systems.

Authors:  Damla Ozsu; Ertugrul Karatas; Hakan Arslan; Meltem C Topcu
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-10

6.  In Vitro Comparison of Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Preparation of Mandibular Premolars with Manual and Rotary Instruments.

Authors:  Sonal Soi; Suman Yadav; Sumeet Sharma; Mohit Sharma
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2015-09-16

7.  Reciproc versus Twisted file for root canal filling removal: assessment of apically extruded debris.

Authors:  Demet Altunbas; Betul Kutuk; Mustafa Toyoglu; Gizem Kutlu; Alper Kustarci; Kursat Er
Journal:  J Istanb Univ Fac Dent       Date:  2016-04-01

8.  Evaluation of conventional, protaper hand and protaper rotary instrumentation system for apical extrusion of debris, irrigants and bacteria- An in vitro randomized trial.

Authors:  Pinky Kalra; Arathi Rao; Ethel Suman; Ramya Shenoy; Baranya-Shrikrishna Suprabha
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-02-01

9.  Comparison of apical and coronal extrusions using reciprocating and rotary instrumentation systems.

Authors:  Yan Lu; Min Chen; Feng Qiao; Ligeng Wu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.757

10.  Postoperative Pain after Endodontic Treatment of Asymptomatic Teeth Using Rotary Instruments: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Shahriar Shahi; Vahideh Asghari; Saeed Rahimi; Mehrdad Lotfi; Mohammad Samiei; Hamidreza Yavari; Sahar Shakouie; Saeed Nezafati
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2015-12-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.